Where is the False Resistance now?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 149
  • Start date
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 149

Member 149 is Machabees

Where is the False Resistance now?

Certainly lines have been drawn. But where is the false resistance? Below are the stated positions of each of the three 'resistance' bishops and some of their priests within the false resistance.


[As of March 2017]

Bishop Williamson:

The most controversial figure post 2012 in which many follow whether informed or uninformed.

To his credit:
  • He stood up, for what we publicly know, against the new direction of the neo-sspx within his Eleison Comments of 2012; in which he was clearly and unjustly expelled for. He also stated this in his last [public] letter to Bishop Fellay http://www.therecusant.com/bp-w-open-letter-to-bp-f
  • In fairness too, though Bishop Fellay said the expulsion was about “disobedience”, he then restated otherwise on March 2015, and hence, admitted in his Dici.org publication it was about the relations with conciliar rome. Bishop Fellay, quote: ...because of [his] violent criticisms of any relations with the Roman authorities. According to them, such contacts were incompatible with the apostolic work of Archbishop Lefebvre.” http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?thr...ngen-consecration-of-fr-faure.2771/#post-4274
His public position (post 2012 to date):
  • Accepts the false “Extraordinary mass” in the 2007 Moto Proprio:
“Nevertheless "The journey of a thousand miles" begins with the first step. Given the terrible official persecution of the true rite of Mass ever since 1969 when the Novus Ordo was introduced, surely two things at least in the Motu Proprio were worth a Te Deum. Firstly, the official, Papal, public recognition that the old Mass was never truly suppressed. We always knew it, but now every Catholic knows it in the Universal Church. What a change of perception that must entail! And secondly, a certain definite freedom for Latin rite priests to celebrate the old Mass, at least in private and to a greater extent than before also in public.

“Let us pray as much as ever for the Pope, if not more, that his Bavarian heart continue to push his conciliar head in a Catholic direction!" (Bishop Richard Williamson La Reja, Argentina) http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/ecclesia-dei-institutes-and-sspx-unite.5054/#post-9296
  • Accepts the false “lifting of the excommunications”. With his own pen, he gives a sincere personal thank you to Benedict XVI:
“Your Eminence…Please also accept, and convey to the Holy Father, my sincere personal thanks for the document signed last Wednesday and made public on Saturday. Most humbly I will offer a Mass for both of you. Sincerely yours in Christ.” (+Richard Williamson, January 28, 2009) http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2009/01/apology-letter-of-bishop-richard.html
  • He believes in novus ordo “miracles”. (Conference in Mahopac NY (usa), June 2015; Eleison Comments #437, 30th November 2015; Eleison Comments #437, 30th November 2015)
  • He says that the Anglican church has true worship in it:
"Our Lord said seek and you shall find; knock and it will be open to you. If you look for the truth, and you look for the true worship of God, you may find some of it in an Anglican Church. But you start talking to the minister, probably his principles are most likely are not completely true.” (Bishop Richard Williamson: 'The Existence of God: The Pre-requisite for all Politics', July 2016, @1:19:09, www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQalQor5itQ

More unbelievable quotes from Bishop Williamson can be found here, http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?thr...rting-the-new-religion-and-conciliarism.4457/


Bishop Faure:

To his credit:
  • He stood firm in the 2012 sspx General Chapter resulting to his departure seeing the persistence of the authorities to succeed in their betrayal to tradition.
His public position (post 2012 to date):
  • He accepts and supports Bp. Williamson’s belief in the NOM. “Where did you see that Archbishop Lefebvre said that the New Mass is outside the Church?” (Bishop Faure, Letter to Father Ernesto Cardozo, 1/6/2016)
  • Believes in the conciliar church. “It is not possible that God has abandoned 98% of the souls. We have to read attentively and understand what Bishop Williamson wants to say. There can be, within us, the danger of radicalization.” (Bishop Faure, Sermon 12/06/15, Saltillo, Mexico)
  • Refuses to accept other priests who disagree with his errors. “Do not invite Father Cardozo to say Mass.” (Bishop Faure, Letter to the faithful of Santo Andres)

Bishop Thomas Aquinas:

To his credit:
  • He stood up side by side with Archbishop Lefebvre in the early days; Was removed by his mother Monastery in Le Barroux France; Chastised by Menzingen being against their own modernism with rome causing a split within the three Traditional monasteries; Detracted from the other traditional Benedictines supported and developed by him -in France and America.
His public position (post 2012 to date):
  • He defends and accepts Bp. Williamson’s position on the NOM.
“We should come to the conclusion that there is something good in the New Mass.” (Bishop Aquinas, "In defense of Bishop Williamson II") Also, "I don't see anything wrong in Bishop Williamson’s writings." (Catechism monastery of Santa Cruz/ RJ, December/2015; Also, "I believe Bishop Williamson didn't write anything wrong." (letter to Father Cardozo 1/27/2016)​
  • Boycotts anyone who goes against Bishop Williamson.
“People who disagree with or criticize Bishop Williamson should not be made welcome. Priests who disagree with or criticize Bishop Williamson should not be received and the faithful should not go to their Mass. Criticizing Bishop Williamson has consequences.” (Letter of Dom Tomas Aquinas to Fr. Cardozo)


Avrille Dominicans:

To their credit:
  • The Dominicans are helping to teach in Bishop Faure new seminary.
Their public position (post 2012 to date):
  • They now believe in the conciliar church.
“The conciliar and neo-modernist Church is therefore neither a substantially different church from the Catholic Church, nor absolutely identical, it mysteriously has something of the one and of the other: it is a foreign body which occupies the Catholic Church. So we need to distinguish between them without separating them.” (Arville Dominicans, Sel de la Terre, 94, Autumn 2015)​
  • They too support Sedevacantism in the false resistance:
Quote, Fr. Rioult:
“In July 2014, in Avrille, Bishop Williamson, in front of about 20 assembled priests,(…), allowed liberty to each one to be ‘una cum’ or ‘non una cum’ at the Canon of the Mass. Dom Thomas Aquinas [now Bishop] was in favor of this liberty and Fr, Altamira also. Fr. Pierre- Marie, prior of Avrille, didn’t make any objection. The only opposition came from Father Pfeiffer. In what concerns the priests of the Union Sacerdotale Marcel Lefebvre, some are ‘una cum’ and others are ‘non una cum.’[/URL]
Source: - Discours sur l’Église romaine face à l’apostasie (7/12) Foot note {16}

Also, in April 2016, Father Pinaud said to his “non una cum” group in Quebec that after the last official meeting of the USML at the beginning of February 2016 (see EC 452), "A consensus was reached on an important matter. The non una cum position is now an option inside USML. The seminary of Bishop Faure will accept candidates who choose this option and they will be ordained."

  • They support the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; and are silent on their errors!

Fr. Gerardo Zendejas:

To his credit:
  • He was strong and prosperous within the sspx; though silent regarding the deal with the sspx/rome relations.
His public position (post 2014 to date):
  • To this day, Fr. Zendejas had never stated his public position why he left the sspx. He lets people believe it is because of the sspx/rome relations; but never confirmed nor denied it when directly asked. Being so, there was a real concern from priests and faithful where he was coming from and what his motives were. Archbishop Lefebvre said the faithful have a strict right to know the doctrine of their priests. Fr. zendejas remained silent; but aggressive in taking over some of the established chapels within the Catholic Resistance. See here directly from the priests themselves: http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/father-zendejas-joins-the-catholic-resistance.2720/
  • Believes: “The apparent conflict between ‘obedience’ and ‘Truth’ rests on AMBIGUITY” [??? Not true. Truth and obedience are not alternatives, they go together. ]; There might be salvation outside the conciliar church; The novelty and false teaching of Vatican II came AFTER. See here, http://www.therecusant.com/fake-resistance-statements
  • He supports the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; and is silent on their errors!

Fr. Chazal:

To his credit:
  • He was strong and prosperous within the sspx and was one of the first with Fr. Pfeiffer to go public with the sspx modernism/rome relations. Fr. Pfeiffer www.youtube.com/watch?v=N89Oww3bQZg Fr. Chazal - War on… www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYiB_FrpuNU
  • He was expelled from the sspx in Oct. 2012.
  • He began sspx-mc missions throughout the world with Fr. Pfeiffer.
His public position (post 2012 to date):

Fr. Picot:

To his credit:
  • He stood up as a Prior of the sspx with admonishment before Bishop Fellay fostering the corruption of modernism within the neo-sspx and sell-out to conciliar rome.
  • He began helping Fr. Chazal in the seminary and missions in Asia.
His public position (post 2014 to date):


Father Trincado

To his credit:
  • He stood up before Bishop Fellay against the modernism in the neo-sspx.
  • Is the [author] of the Non Posumus website and sister site Syllabus-errorum.blogspot
His public position (post 2013 to date):
  • Believes and supports Bp. Williamson’s view of the NOM, and it’s novus ordo “miracles”.
“Father the New Mass has a place inside the Catholic Church. but, my dearest father, the argument related to the possibility of the miracle outside of the Catholic Church, has no relation to the 3 EC of Bishop Williamson, which are about the possible miracles in the NO Masses, because these Masses are celebrated inside the Church.” (Letter to Fr Cardozo, 12/13/15)​
  • He dedicates his two websites to Bp. Williamson’s cause; again out of utility regardless of the errors.

Fr. Juan Carlos Ortiz:

To his credit:
  • He too stood up against Menzingen for their false deal with rome.
  • He wrote a fantastic article entitled “THE NEW "HERMENEUTICS" OF BISHOP FELLAY Has the Society changed its position?” http://www.therecusant.com/fr-ortiz-speaks-out
His public position (post 2013 to date):


Fr. Patrick Girouard:

To his credit:
  • Started a chapel in western Canada.
His public position (post 2013 to date):
  • He supports the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility and chastises those who don’t. He is silent on their errors!

Fr. Richard Voigt:

To his credit:
  • Was a part of the original stand against Menzingen openly starting an opposition.
His public position (post 2013 to date):
  • Became resolute to follow the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; and is silent on their errors!
  • Started his own home mission in Utica, New York.

Fr. Ringrose:

[Unknown post false resistance]


Fr. MacDonald:

To his credit:
  • Also stood against Menzingen openly starting an opposition.
His public position (post 2013 to date):
  • With a dialectic, he says he doesn’t agree with what Bp. Williamson said regarding the NOM (above), he yet says that “In this case His Excellency gave bad advice. Most good priests do from time to time. The Church is infallible, priests and bishops are not.” (Fr. MacDonald letter to Mr. Johnson’s false claim defending Bp. Williamson) http://www.cor-mariae.com/index.php...ieves-in-the-conciliar-church.3918/#post-6703 The dialectic is that Fr. MacDonald remains the error(s) only as a view (conveniently?) of “bad advice” when Bp. Williamson adamantly shows over and over again, Fr. MacDonald knows, a pertinacity in his Eleison Comments and conferences spreading this SAME error!

Priests of the USML: (Fr. Olivier RIOULT, Fr. Pierre Roy, Fr. Nicolas Pinaud [who are open sedevacantists], and Fr. Pivert, Fr. Bruno, Fr. Zendejas)

To their credit:
  • They stood up respectively against the workings of Menzingen trying to acquire a practical deal with modern rome.
Their public position (post 2013 to date):
  • They all support and align with the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; while silent to their errors! http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?thr...non-una-cum”-seminarians-to-be-ordained.4493/



Many other sspx priests have called out these three bishops on their compromises and errors, as with the PAX priests aligning with them, only to receive cold-chastisement: repeated refusals of the Catholic sacraments (Confirmations and elevation to Holy orders); As well as repeated refusals to receive Holy oils for the sick and dying!

What is the difference between these three bishops and the three bishops of the neo-sspx committing the SAME betrayals against the faith and tyranny holding the sacraments as weapons? None!

Therefore we as Catholics must continue the perennial fight for the purity of the faith and honor of God Archbishop Lefebvre has stood so mightily for against the Vatican II onslaught designed to apostate souls. Many popes and over 5,000+ bishops have fallen with thousands of other priests and multitudes of Catholics throughout the world. This is NOT a game! Our Lady had foretold this apostation in Fatima and La Salette; do we head the message from heaven or squander like those walking by our Lord hanging on the blood soaked Cross?

Of course the SSPX-mc priests [Frs. Pfeiffer , Hewko and friend priests: Frs. Hugo Riuz, Fuchs, de Mérode, Ernesto Cardozo, Arturo Vargas, Fernando Altamira, Raphaël Arizaga OSB, Bufe, Ribas, to my memory] had spoken out and are on the top of these [false] Catholic bishops' list to boycott. These faithful priests to our Lord have been with the bishops from the beginning, only to be chastised for remaining steadfast according to the guidance of Archbishop Lefebvre; everyone knows this, but turns a blind eye!

Here are some recent articles from these friend priests.

Fr. Cardozo:
Fr. Raphael’s latest:

Fr. Fernando Altamira:
Christ needs to be first; not last!

(Matthew 10):
“Everyone therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven. But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven.”

The Fathers of the Church and the Popes have left us instructions on what to do in any crisis of faith created by man’s sin and the devil:

"If the faith is in imminent peril, prelates ought to be accused by their subjects, even in public."
-St. Thomas Aquinas

"The greatest obstacle in the apostolate of the Church is the timidity or rather the cowardice of the faithful."
-Pope St. Pius X

"When lies have been accepted for some time, the truth always astounds with an air of novelty."

-St. Clement of Alexandria

"To recoil before an enemy, or to keep silence when from all sides such clamors are raised against truth, is the part of a man either devoid of character or who entertains doubt as to the truth of what he professes to believe. In both cases such mode of behaving is base and is insulting to God, and both are incompatible with the salvation of mankind."
-Pope Leo XIII, Sapientiae Christianae

"They knew only too well the intimate bond that unites faith with worship, the law of belief with the law of prayer, and so, under the pretext of restoring the order of the liturgy to its primitive form, they corrupted it in many respects to adapt it to the errors of the Innovators."
-Pope Leo XIII, Apostolicae Curae

"It is better that the truth be known than that scandal be covered up."
-St. Augustine

"Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it; and indeed to neglect to confound evil men, when we can do it, is no less a sin than to encourage them." - Pope St. Felix III

From the Stigmatist, Julie Jahenny:
On November 27, 1902 and May 10, 1904, Our Lord and Our Lady announced the conspiracy to invent the "New Mass": "I give you a WARNING. The disciples who are not of My Gospel are now working hard to remake according to their ideas and under the influence of the enemy of souls a MASS that contains words that are ODIOUS in My sight. When the fatal hour arrives when the faith of my priests is put to the test, it will be (these texts) that will be celebrated in this SECOND period ... The FIRST period is (the one) of my priesthood which exists since Me. The SECOND is (the one) of the persecution when the ENEMIES of the Faith and of Holy Religion (will impose their formulas) in the book of the second celebration ... These infamous spirits are those who crucified Me and are awaiting the kingdom of THE NEW MESSIAH."

"It is granted to few to recognize the true Church amid the darkness of so many schisms and heresies, and to fewer still so to love the truth which they have seen as to fly to its embrace." - St. Robert Bellarmine
Last edited by a moderator:

Deleted member 149

Good news.

I received word that many have been sending out emails linking to this compilation of quotes from these bishops and priests to good effects. One report said they sent it to each of the three bishops, the Avrille Dominicans, and to some of the priests therein to draw reflection how wrong they are gravely compromising and conflating the faith into something foreign St. Paul condemned; hoping they will give an honest thought what they are doing and publicly retract their position.

As said above, Christ needs to be first; not last!

The gravity of the false resistance treading a new path, yet bearing the same Vatican II revolution, is so clear and against the well documented position and grace given to Archbishop Lefebvre throughout this now 47 year fight.

It seems that many have done this out of human respect not to go "against" Bishop Williamson. But our Lord showed us that Judas and Peter did not want to go "against" another's ego too; Judas remained in his stubbornness and lost his soul, while Peter wept and became St. Peter.

Will they all return? Some of them? We hope so. Bishop Williamson started this mess. He can fix it too. But do the others need to wait for him to be "un-stubborn" and first loose his ego? No, it is Christ we serve; not humans regardless what color hat they wear: white, red, purple, or a watermelon.

Bishop Williamson did say that “Facts are stubborn things”. So is the revelation and betrayals of the false resistance!

Fr. Hewko also distinguished their revolution in his latest issue of Gladium, here Sons of Archbishop Lefebvre, Come Back to your Father.

What will it take? Will they come back? Whether they do or not, we need to be constant and unchanging faithful to our Lord and our baptismal promises. God can rise up praise and more bishops from the rocks:

(Luke 19):
"To whom he said: I say to you, that if these shall hold their peace, the stones will cry out."
Last edited by a moderator:


Well-Known Member
From Facebook:
Marian Corps of St. Pius X

1 hr ·
Marian Corps of Saint Pius X

This is a very brief summary that I have created from the sermon of Fr. Picot this Sunday. This may lack some information but the major things are mentioned here.

In the 4 or 5 years of fighting for the faith, Fr. Francois Chazal, Fr. Valan D.Rajakumar, Fr. Rémi Picot, Fr. Arogya Suneel Pio, I believe God has brought together to provide sacraments to the faithfuls. A very small number of priests but you can never imagine how great things they have accomplished! Roaming around the Central Asia and Australia, they have provided so much inspiration to the faithfuls to still fight for the true faith and resist the errors of the world! And now, we can say that there are more greater things coming our way! This recent meeting was a great thing since the MCSPX is now more organized than ever. Fr. Chazal has been elected as the General Head for 3 years. In the meeting, they have discussed about the mistakes of how power went wrong amongst the NEO SSPX and so they decided to cut the term short so that if the General becomes liberal, it won't affect the others so much. The MCSPX is NOT a new order, I would just to make it clear! They had to change their name just for legal purposes. They have agreed that they are going to continue to use or follow the same rules as the Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre had created, they are going to keep everything the same to avoid any errors of creating new rules, the only little change that they did was of how long the term is for the General head priest, this is to avoid abuse of power. This they made clear in their discussion, that, the MCSPX is not Sedevacantist, that they regard Pope Francis as the head of the Catholic church but would strongly resist any errors that the Pope may teach! And still strongly oppose the false doctrine of the Vatican II council. With regards to Pfeifferism(SSPX-MC, Fr. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko), the MCSPX is totally separate and not the same! Fr. Pfieffer has totally followed the wrong path, in which really is a sad truth and so the MCSPX told him before that he had to go on on his own. Thank you for the fellow priests who are helping the MCSPX in taking in the missions especially our newly ordained priest, Fr. John and to all those other priests who are extending their help.

As a fellow faithful, I call on you my dear friends, let us strongly pray for our priests, let us support them both spiritually and financially. Pray for more holy religious vocations! I call on the young parents to have confidence in the Lord, and bring forth more children so that they may be our future priests and nuns! The world needs more of them! I know that having many children is a very difficult task, I know so, because I, at 31 yrs. old, have 4 of my own(a 6 yr. old, 3 yr. old, 2 yr. old and a 1 yr. old) but it is such a glory to God! So if we, parents, do our duties as ordered by God, we can assure our place in Heaven which is our aim, to see our God!

For the priests in the mainstream SSPX and also to all the traditional priests in the whole world, I know some of you know the errors but still keep silent, I pray that the Blessed Lady may give you more strength to say "NO" to the errors and finally speak the truth and RESIST!!! The resistance priests and Bishops are not your enemies, they are simply speaking the truth! Do not be scared to JOIN the resistance! People will support you, Our Blessed Lady will be at your side to uphold you! TAKE THE CROSS OF OUR LORD FOR THE REIGN OF HIS KINGSHIP AND HE HIMSELF WILL MAKE YOU TRIUMPH! The real enemies of the Catholic Faith are those who compromise and accept the liberalism and modernism of the church. I CALL UPON YOUR BRAVE SOULS TO FINALLY STAND UP FOR THE LORD!!! VIVA CRISTO REY! DEO GRATIAS!


For the priests in the mainstream SSPX and also to all the traditional priests in the whole world, I know some of you know the errors but still keep silent, I pray that the Blessed Lady may give you more strength to say "NO" to the errors and finally speak the truth and RESIST!!! The resistance priests and Bishops are not your enemies, they are simply speaking the truth!

I specially like this bit! o_O

Not open for further replies.