The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit VIII


Well-Known Member
7:46 - 10:14

You have all sorts of people now disciples of the new Psychology. One of these person is a man named Joseph Yastrow (1864 -1944). This is Heinze's (Jews and the American Soul, Andrew R. Heinze) description of what Yastrow was doing at the University of Wisconsin.

"Yastrow targeted Christianity in a way that Pierce did not. He also used the biblical and rabbical phraseology of the remnant of Israel when referred to the dissident few who fight in all times and places for freedom of thought. There will always be a saving remnant, he wrote, who are willing to give up dogma. As the prime example of the forceable imposition of thought on a community of people. In his course at Wisconsin on the psychology of belief and his popular writings, he spoke, of the "sad page of history that records the Churches techniques of censorship and suppression of thought."

What you are seeing here is that deviance has been redefined. It will be redefined over the course of the century. And what used to be a sin is now a virtue. For example, homosexuality, what used to be an aberation is now normal. And what used to be normal, let us say the revulsion at homosexuality is now a thought crime under the regime of political correctness.

So a student at Temple University (Dr. Jones' alma mater) who objects to the production of Corpus Christi by the university was dragged out and taken to the Psychiatric Clinic at Temple University Hospital ( for objecting to a blasphemous homosexual play.

Well this is the essence of political correctness. This is the essence of what happened during the course of the 20th century. Deviance was redefined as it's opposite. Deviance is prohibition. There is never going to be a world without deviance. What you have here is the "transvaluation of values". Where what was good is now bad, and what was good is now wicked.

This happens in the realm of Psychology largely thru the efforts of people like Freud. So you see this as a way of cultural subversion. Freud became the vehicle for cultural subversion. And was interested in those particular terms.


Is the marketing term "branded or "branding" being used by the n-sspx another word for "human respect" in a Catholic sense?

And is "human respect" in a Catholic sense another word for "cultural subversion" and "transvaluation of values"?

Is the "cultural subversion" or 'transvaluation of values" explained in this excerpt above, being played out now in the Conciliar Church (Hermeneutic of Continuity v. Hermeneutic of Rupture), the N-SSPX (Doctrinal Declaration), Bishop Williamson (loose federation) (Maria Valtorta)?

How much of what we are experiencing in this fight for the Catholic Faith is a result of an infiltration of Jews into the Catholic Church (the smoke of Satan, spoken about by Paul VI) attempting to destroy the Catholic Faith?

Did not Fr. Bouchacourt, District Superior of France, N-SSPX, say that the Jews are not guilty of deicide?

Let us remember who the Jews are;

What did Vatican II, Nostra Aetate, say about the Jews, section 4 paragraph 5;

"Furthermore, in her rejection of every persecution against any man, the Church, mindful of the patrimony (an estate inherited from one's father or ancestor) she shares with the Jews and moved not by political reasons but by the Gospel's spiritual love, decries hatred, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism, directed against Jews at any time and by anyone."

"With the condemnation of Anti-Semitism, which at times is called Antisemitic racialism, it is wished to attain that his Holiness the Pope and the assembled Council, in condemnation of Antisemitism, experience the catastrophic event, that the Church contradict itself, and therefore without giving account of this, silently also condemns Christ, our Lord, himself, as well as the Holy Gospels, the Church Fathers and most Popes, among them Gregory VII (Hildebrand), Innocence II, Innocence III, Pius V, and Leo XIII, who as we will show in this book have fought bitterly against the Jews and the "Synagogue of Satan."

With such condemnation it would be successful to simultaneously place countless Church Councils in the dock, among them Ecumenical Councils of Nicaea and the Second, Third, and Fourth Lateran Councils, whose Canons we will subject in this book to a thorough investigation, and which carried on an energetic struggle against the Hebrews. To put it in a few words, the infamous plotters have the scheme in mind that Holy Church, by it condemning Antisemitism, condemn itself, whereby one can easily amplify the disastrous consequences." (The Plot Against the Church - Maurice Pinay, p. 18)

Last edited: