D
Deleted member 149
Guest
Member 49 is Machabees
Below are two more interviews Bishop Fellay gave recently moving forward to be inclusive within the conciliar church.
--------------------------------------------------
Source: http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2017/01/sspx-superior-general-fellay-agreement.html#more
SSPX Superior-General Fellay: "An agreement is possible without further wait."
From the interview granted by the Superior-General of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), Bishop Bernard Fellay, to the program "Terres de Mission" by TVLibertes, a conservative French network, as reported by Italian website Radio Spada:
Bishop Fellay confirmed in the program Terres de Mission of TVLibertes broadcast minutes ago: on the factual level, relations with the Vatican are already normal, and only the seal is missing on the agreement:
"This agreement is possible, according to the Superior-general, in his view, without waiting for the situation in the Church to become complete satisfactory." [Source]
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And from an interview with sspx Fr. Larons-
Source : http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&langpair=es|en&rurl=www.google.com&sp=nmt4&u=http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/2017/01/nueva-entrevista-de-mons-fellay-mas-de.html&usg=ALkJrhgE_hQscKq2qbdHBwE7WbOmBKA34Q
On the occasion of his recent visit to Paris, Bishop Fellay gave an interview to Father Lorans in "Radio Courtoisie". This interview was recorded on Friday, January 13 and broadcast on Thursday, January 26. You can hear the interview on this link . DICI made the corresponding announcement here .
While awaiting the transcription of the entire interview (which lasts 1 hour), Non Possumus publishes excerpts of relevant passages from it.
Question - Bishop Schneider recently declared that he invited him to accept the Roman propositions of a canonical agreement, without delaying too much and not demanding perfection. Is it to say that the doctrinal agreement should be put in the background? What is the position of the Fraternity in this respect?
Bishop Fellay: The problem is not in the structure, the structure is already well established, the most important, the general idea ; And is adequate and corresponds to our needs [refers to the personal prelature offered by Rome to the SSPX (*)] . This is not the problem, the problem is a great fight of ideas: if the Church for 40 years imposes a line, which is the modern line, and for which we have even been declared schismatic and all that. So: this Church is or is not willing to let us continue our journey. It is Monsignor Lefebvre who spoke of letting us experience the Tradition. Do they let us or do not they let us do it, or will they tell us tomorrow that we have to align ourselves? Everything is there, everything is there. We are still out of the law, tolerated, and with Pope Francis, surprisingly, even more than tolerated. We stay here? Do we go further?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noting the contradiction Bishop Fellay just made, i.e. it is acceptable to exist within and support the promulgating of the new religion, but for branding purposes, BF will not say it explicitly in that format except to term is as a [compromised] "experiment of tradition".
Of course the real Catholic Tradition does not give credence, incense, or support for new religions against Christ. So this "experience of Tradition" Bishop Fellay speaks of is only negotiating more of the "conservative inc." on top of the ecclesia dei variety. Modern Rome has no problem with that except for wanting to contain it with FULL control; which is conceded by Bishop Fellay when we hear from him using the branding term "accept us as we are" marking the full acceptance Bishop Fellay wishes to please "both" sides.
Below are two more interviews Bishop Fellay gave recently moving forward to be inclusive within the conciliar church.
--------------------------------------------------
Source: http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2017/01/sspx-superior-general-fellay-agreement.html#more
SSPX Superior-General Fellay: "An agreement is possible without further wait."
From the interview granted by the Superior-General of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), Bishop Bernard Fellay, to the program "Terres de Mission" by TVLibertes, a conservative French network, as reported by Italian website Radio Spada:
Bishop Fellay confirmed in the program Terres de Mission of TVLibertes broadcast minutes ago: on the factual level, relations with the Vatican are already normal, and only the seal is missing on the agreement:
"This agreement is possible, according to the Superior-general, in his view, without waiting for the situation in the Church to become complete satisfactory." [Source]
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And from an interview with sspx Fr. Larons-
Source : http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&langpair=es|en&rurl=www.google.com&sp=nmt4&u=http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/2017/01/nueva-entrevista-de-mons-fellay-mas-de.html&usg=ALkJrhgE_hQscKq2qbdHBwE7WbOmBKA34Q
On the occasion of his recent visit to Paris, Bishop Fellay gave an interview to Father Lorans in "Radio Courtoisie". This interview was recorded on Friday, January 13 and broadcast on Thursday, January 26. You can hear the interview on this link . DICI made the corresponding announcement here .
While awaiting the transcription of the entire interview (which lasts 1 hour), Non Possumus publishes excerpts of relevant passages from it.
Question - Bishop Schneider recently declared that he invited him to accept the Roman propositions of a canonical agreement, without delaying too much and not demanding perfection. Is it to say that the doctrinal agreement should be put in the background? What is the position of the Fraternity in this respect?
Bishop Fellay: The problem is not in the structure, the structure is already well established, the most important, the general idea ; And is adequate and corresponds to our needs [refers to the personal prelature offered by Rome to the SSPX (*)] . This is not the problem, the problem is a great fight of ideas: if the Church for 40 years imposes a line, which is the modern line, and for which we have even been declared schismatic and all that. So: this Church is or is not willing to let us continue our journey. It is Monsignor Lefebvre who spoke of letting us experience the Tradition. Do they let us or do not they let us do it, or will they tell us tomorrow that we have to align ourselves? Everything is there, everything is there. We are still out of the law, tolerated, and with Pope Francis, surprisingly, even more than tolerated. We stay here? Do we go further?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noting the contradiction Bishop Fellay just made, i.e. it is acceptable to exist within and support the promulgating of the new religion, but for branding purposes, BF will not say it explicitly in that format except to term is as a [compromised] "experiment of tradition".
Of course the real Catholic Tradition does not give credence, incense, or support for new religions against Christ. So this "experience of Tradition" Bishop Fellay speaks of is only negotiating more of the "conservative inc." on top of the ecclesia dei variety. Modern Rome has no problem with that except for wanting to contain it with FULL control; which is conceded by Bishop Fellay when we hear from him using the branding term "accept us as we are" marking the full acceptance Bishop Fellay wishes to please "both" sides.
Last edited by a moderator: