Sr. Lucy fraud exposed

Admin

Administrator
Vatican Fraud Exposed! Sworn Declaration from Professional Handwriting Analyst that Letter from Sister Lucy II in 1969 Was Written By Imposter and Not By Sister Lucy I. Here is Scientific Evidence that the Sister Lucy II, post-1958 Was a Fraud. Read the 125 page declaration here.

January 18, 2019





https://drive.google.com/file/d/11SUUICfOKgXuRTW9IckIrVPUqY0tnHSz/view?usp=sharing

And Much Much More To Come. The Fraud Has Been Exposed. The Evidence Mounts.

Just in case you missed it on October 13th, here is another expert report, this time from a plastic surgeon concerning the case of Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II.

there-was-imposter-on-day-of-miracle-of.html

Source

..
 

Attachments

Shrine

Member
Vatican Fraud Exposed! Sworn Declaration from Professional Handwriting Analyst that Letter from Sister Lucy II in 1969 Was Written By Imposter and Not By Sister Lucy I
Is this the same person that worked on the leaked third secret of Fatima?

In it, the Papacy moves from Rome, Italy and goes to Fatima, Portugal.

It makes sense in a way because it follows from the line that states that the dogma of faith won't leave Portugal.

It is up on Tradition in Action:


JMJ

Now I am going to reveal the third fragment of the secret: This part is the apostasy in the Church!

Our Lady showed us the individual who I describe as the 'holy Father' in front of a multitude that was cheering him.

But there was a difference from a true holy Father, his devilish gaze, this one had the gaze of evil.

Then, after some moments we saw the same Pope entering a Church, but this Church was the Church of hell; there is no way to describe the ugliness of that place. It looked like a gray cement fortress with broken angles and windows similar to eyes; it had a beak in the roof of the building.

Next, we raised our eyes to Our Lady who said to us: You saw the apostasy in the Church; this letter can be opened by the holy Father, but it must be announced after Pius XII and before 1960.

In the kingdom of John Paul II the cornerstone of Peter's grave must be removed and transferred to Fatima.

Because the dogma of the faith is not conserved in Rome, its authority will be removed and delivered to Fatima.

The cathedral of Rome must be destroyed and a new one built in Fatima.

If 69 weeks after this order is announced, Rome continues its abomination, the city will be destroyed.

Our Lady told us that this is written,[in] Daniel 9:24-25 and Matthew 21:42-44



 

Admin

Administrator
As this site recently broke: an unbiased handwriting expert--one of the best in the entire country--recently examined a 1969 letter and concluded it was "highly probable" that the authentic Sister Lucia did NOT write the 1969 letter based upon hundreds of pages of known writings. Equally interesting, the expert commented on an unusual aspect of the 1969 letter: the presence of printed, non-cursive writing.

Despite hundreds of pages of known writings of Sister Lucia, none contain printed, non-cursive writing. This is particularly true as related to words with lower case printed letters. No examples exist. Yet, the 1969 letter does contain such writing. Specifically, the 1969 contains the following phrase:

"...precisamos manter-nos fiéis, firmes na fé, na esperança e na caridade unidos ao representante de Cristo na terra..."

"...we need to remain faithful, firm in Faith, Hope and Charity, united to the representatives of Christ on earth...."

The expert commented:

"The words printed in lowercase in the 11th line from the bottom on Q5 (which
contains the word “Esperanca”) is a variation in writing formation within the
questioned document that is unaccounted for. The printed letters do not match the
writer of the rest of the questioned document
."

Why would the expert go so far as to insinuate an entirely different person wrote the printed words? Some handwriting experts claim that handwriting gives information about the personality of an individual, a glimpse of various character traits. If this is true, then one explanation for the expert's comment could be that the imposter Sister Lucia reverted back, at least in part, to her natural writing form when she wrote in print--accidently revealing her own distinct personality.

The imitated cursive writing is just that: imitated. Unlike the hundreds of pages of cursive writing from the genuine Sister Lucia, there are no KNOWN writings of Sister Lucia to imitate for purposes of lower case print. If that is the case, then the only choice the imposter had was to use her own, naturally learned style of print handwriting while mixing in a few of formation tendencies of the known writings.

This evidence demonstrates that the 1969 letter is a forged attempt to imitate the person (and personality) of the authentic Sister Lucia, convince people that the "representatives" of Christ in 1969 deserved complete loyalty, while, at the very same moment, inadvertently unveiling the distinctly different PERSON lurking below.

In sum, the Vatican presented a woman to the world in 1967 which they claimed was the real Sister Lucia. They also claimed she wrote a letter in 1969 urging absolute submission to them. However, based on her writing in 1969, we can affirmatively and objectively conclude two distinct personalities were exhibited by her hand. It will be for the Vatican to explain why.

Much more to come on this issue. Please continue to support our efforts to find the truth. It makes these scientific examinations possible.


Please download and review the detailed, sworn declaration of the handwriting expert.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MkDef5qDNj2OV22t93Y0wSHrXkknY_RD/view?usp=sharing




The 1969 "Split Personality" Letter.

..

 
Top