Sr. Lucy fraud exposed

Admin

Administrator
Vatican Fraud Exposed! Sworn Declaration from Professional Handwriting Analyst that Letter from Sister Lucy II in 1969 Was Written By Imposter and Not By Sister Lucy I. Here is Scientific Evidence that the Sister Lucy II, post-1958 Was a Fraud. Read the 125 page declaration here.

January 18, 2019





https://drive.google.com/file/d/11SUUICfOKgXuRTW9IckIrVPUqY0tnHSz/view?usp=sharing

And Much Much More To Come. The Fraud Has Been Exposed. The Evidence Mounts.

Just in case you missed it on October 13th, here is another expert report, this time from a plastic surgeon concerning the case of Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II.

there-was-imposter-on-day-of-miracle-of.html

Source

..
 

Attachments

Admin

Administrator
As this site recently broke: an unbiased handwriting expert--one of the best in the entire country--recently examined a 1969 letter and concluded it was "highly probable" that the authentic Sister Lucia did NOT write the 1969 letter based upon hundreds of pages of known writings. Equally interesting, the expert commented on an unusual aspect of the 1969 letter: the presence of printed, non-cursive writing.

Despite hundreds of pages of known writings of Sister Lucia, none contain printed, non-cursive writing. This is particularly true as related to words with lower case printed letters. No examples exist. Yet, the 1969 letter does contain such writing. Specifically, the 1969 contains the following phrase:

"...precisamos manter-nos fiéis, firmes na fé, na esperança e na caridade unidos ao representante de Cristo na terra..."

"...we need to remain faithful, firm in Faith, Hope and Charity, united to the representatives of Christ on earth...."

The expert commented:

"The words printed in lowercase in the 11th line from the bottom on Q5 (which
contains the word “Esperanca”) is a variation in writing formation within the
questioned document that is unaccounted for. The printed letters do not match the
writer of the rest of the questioned document
."

Why would the expert go so far as to insinuate an entirely different person wrote the printed words? Some handwriting experts claim that handwriting gives information about the personality of an individual, a glimpse of various character traits. If this is true, then one explanation for the expert's comment could be that the imposter Sister Lucia reverted back, at least in part, to her natural writing form when she wrote in print--accidently revealing her own distinct personality.

The imitated cursive writing is just that: imitated. Unlike the hundreds of pages of cursive writing from the genuine Sister Lucia, there are no KNOWN writings of Sister Lucia to imitate for purposes of lower case print. If that is the case, then the only choice the imposter had was to use her own, naturally learned style of print handwriting while mixing in a few of formation tendencies of the known writings.

This evidence demonstrates that the 1969 letter is a forged attempt to imitate the person (and personality) of the authentic Sister Lucia, convince people that the "representatives" of Christ in 1969 deserved complete loyalty, while, at the very same moment, inadvertently unveiling the distinctly different PERSON lurking below.

In sum, the Vatican presented a woman to the world in 1967 which they claimed was the real Sister Lucia. They also claimed she wrote a letter in 1969 urging absolute submission to them. However, based on her writing in 1969, we can affirmatively and objectively conclude two distinct personalities were exhibited by her hand. It will be for the Vatican to explain why.

Much more to come on this issue. Please continue to support our efforts to find the truth. It makes these scientific examinations possible.


Please download and review the detailed, sworn declaration of the handwriting expert.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MkDef5qDNj2OV22t93Y0wSHrXkknY_RD/view?usp=sharing




The 1969 "Split Personality" Letter.

..

 

Admin

Administrator
Paul VI Refused to Meet with Imposter Sister Lucy during Her Sole Encounter with him on May 13, 1967. Montini the Modernist Spent 3 Minutes Speaking to "Sister Lucy" and Most of the Time Seems to Have been Spent Turning Down Her Request and Telling Her to OBEY.


March 07, 2019
Newspaper Article Depicted in Fr. Luigi Villa's book, Paul VI Beatified?
Above Newspaper Article from Voz da Fatima portrayed immediately above, indicates that the meeting and conversation between Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" only lasted for 3 minutes. The first article portrayed, I discovered in the book by Fr. Luigi Villa entitled Paul VI beatified?. It tells of the woman we now know as "Sister Lucy II" asking Paul VI for a private meeting --- if he believed she was the real Sister Lucy don't you think he would be interested in what she had to say (a new apparition, perhaps?) --- to this request the newspaper above cites him as responding, "As you can see, this is not the moment [I have not gotten all the publicity yet that is my due!]. If you wish then to convey something to me, tell it to your bishop and he will convey it to me. Put great trust in your bishop. Be obedient to him." What did the newly-minted "Sister Lucy" intending to convey to Paul VI? That she did not feel right about the illegal impersonation that she was now taking up? But, for Paul VI, how awkward would it have been to meet with someone you know to be a fraud. Be obedient! Take up the role that we have bestowed upon you and if you have any qualms of conscience or personal difficulties, go cry to the bishop!

Another of the many strange things surrounding this 1967 meeting, amidst the general strangeness of the entire Sister Lucy dos Santos case, is the obviously faked pictures of her in Fatima, with Paul VI. Obviously they could not have been near each other for very long since so many pictures have clearly been faked. What we can see in the first picture presented in the Fr. Villa book is a Sister Lucy who never changes her expression and is inhumanly stiff and artificial in many of the pictures with her and Paul VI. As she stays creepily still, with the exact same gaze and expression on her face, the bespectacled priest is right behind her head on the left of the picture, then in one of the pictures below he is just as close to her on the right side of the picture, then he is a bit of a distance looking with almost an alarmed look on his face. The source picture for all of these "cut and paste" jobs from "Fatima" is given below in two different versions of the exact same photo is portrayed below with NO ONE IN THE BACKGROUND. Note of course that all of this deception was released within one month of the "meeting" between the two.

Reality is stranger than fiction.

Source

..
 

Admin

Administrator
Dr. Chojnowski:
In light of the complete transparency of the Sister Lucy Truth investigation. I feel obligated to tell the readers of RadTrad Thomist were we are now and where will want to SOON be.

Points:
1) We are still on the identification stage of the investigation. We are now very much in the process of collecting reports from relevant professionals which will testify to the identity or misidentify of Sister Lucy of Fatima I (pre-1958) and Sister Lucy of Fatima II (post-1958). Even though the evidence so far as been overwhelming, we want our thoroughness in the case to make any further scientific identification project unnecessary. I would hope that by Easter, this stage of the process could be completed.

2) We are waiting for outstanding reports from the following professionals:
a) 3 Facial Recognition reports from 3 different algorithms and companies. All the companies have an international presence and sphere of operation. Also, a private investigator's report on all of this information, including information which has already been uncovered and fully reported.

b) 1 Plastic Surgeon report.
c) 1 Final Report from a Forensic Artist.
d) 3 Reports from our Handwriting Analyst for 3 documents submitted to him. After this process is completed we want to submit the Tradition-in-Action "Third Secret" for scientific analysis.

3) The Sister Lucy Truth website with all of the collected information and reports will be launched SHORTLY. My colleagues believe that the site can be made available to the public WITHIN THE WEEK. Since we are not finished with the identification process of Sister Lucy Truth, the website will allow for email updates to all of those who sign up, so that once new reports are added to the site --- as these come in, those who have subscribed will be informed of the new scientific information.

4) We are creating a presentation which will be given to private audiences ---- private, so as not to interfere with the ongoing investigation --- concerning all of the most recent findings of the Sister Lucy Truth investigation. One conference has already lined up this presentation.



Please pray for Sister Lucy Truth to Good St. Joseph, Patron of the Catholic Church, so that it can achieve its mission in the coming months.

Source

..
 

Admin

Administrator

Full Website now established HERE



1553569922695.png
PRE-1967 SR. LUCY


1866
POST-1967 SR. LUCY



Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima and the Woman Who Replaced Her


We at Sister Lucy Truth publicly declare that based on the evidence presented here, we have found it to be morally and scientifically certain that the woman portrayed to the world as “Sister Lucy,” from her first public appearance on May 13, 1967 to her death on February 13, 2005, was not the same person as Sister Lucy, Seer of Fatima and Visionary who predicted the Miracle of the Sun on October 13, 1917.

This, one of the greatest frauds in the history of the Church, was discovered through the use of the most sophisticated facial recognition programs available, along with the accumulated testimony of plastic surgeons, orthodontists, forensic artists, private investigators, handwriting analysts, and facial recognition experts. Due to the availability of hundreds of photos of “Sister Lucy” available on the internet and in authoritative biographies, this case of substitution, fraud, and stolen identity has been able to be uncovered and analyzed. Without the judgment of the best and most relevant professionals available, we would not be making this grave accusation and presenting this charge. We will continue to accumulate and post on this site new studies and research concerning this investigation as they are produced and published. All of the names of the relevant experts shall be published along with their professional findings. The truth of the disappearance of the true Sister Lucy and the identity of the imposter who took her place shall be placed before an internationally based private investigator who will investigate and solve the case.

The fraud has been identified and named. We charge the highest officials in the Vatican with conspiracy to perpetuate and conceal the substitution of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima with an as yet unknown Imposter.
______________________________


Purpose:
"Sister Lucy Truth began in 2017 as an effort to discover the truth concerning the life and person of Sister Lúcia dos Santos of Fatima. It was specifically begun as an attempt to find out, by using the latest scientific means and expert consultation, whether or not there was the substitution of an imposter for the real Sister Lucy of Fatima during the years after 1958.

After establishing Sister Lucy Truth as a tax-exempt corporation in order to receive donations to advance the investigation, a world-class private investigator was hired to pursue the case. His task was to work first to establish the truth of the situation, and then, if it was found out that there was a substitution, the inquiry into the fate of the real Sister Lucy and the identity of the imposter was to be commenced.

In the course of 2018, other contacts were made that put Sister Lucy Truth with a wide range of professionals, from accountants, to lawyers, and to the many experts relevant to identifying the woman who was presented as “Sister Lucy of Fatima,” before the eyes of the world from the visit of Paul VI to Fatima on May 13, 1967 to her death in 2005. One of the major events in the career of the woman known as “Sister Lucy” was her presence at the Fatima event on May 13, 2000 in which the Cardinal Secretary of State told the world that the Third Secret of Fatima was to be released to the world on June 26, 2000. Was the woman at these events the woman who had received the revelation at Fatima or was it another?

Suspicions and questions related to the identity of the woman put forward as “Sister Lucy of Fatima,” especially those provoked by photographs available from official sources, were the initial reasons to begin the inquiry. The professionals hired to analyze the photographs, each according to their own specialty and with the relevant technologies, were asked to determine whether the known Sister Lucy, pre-1958, was the same individual as the one presented as ‘Sister Lucy” beginning with an appearance at Fatima for the 50th Anniversary of the Apparition on May 13, 1967.

Sister Lucy Truth has now complied a sufficient number of professional reports to make the judgment that there were two woman, one the authentic Sister Lucy who was the Seer at Fatima in 1917 and an imposter who presented herself as the real Sister Lucy of Fatima at least from May 13, 1967 until her death on February 13, 2005. Even as we commission further reports from other specialists and facial recognition experts in order to complete our understanding of the imposture, we will use the information we have already compiled in order to discover what happened to the true Sister Lucy of Fatima and in order to identify the imposter."

What's next:
AS OF MARCH 25, 2019
  1. We are still on the identification stage of the investigation. We are now very much in the process of collecting reports from relevant professionals which will testify to the identity or misidentify of Sister Lucy of Fatima I (pre-1958) and Sister Lucy of Fatima II (post-1958). Even though the evidence so far as been overwhelming, we want our thoroughness in the case to make any further scientific identification project unnecessary. I would hope that by Easter, this stage of the process could be completed.

  2. We are waiting for outstanding reports from the following professionals:
    1. 3 Facial Recognition reports from 3 different algorithms and companies. All the companies have an international presence and sphere of operation. Also, a private investigator’s report on all of this information, including information which has already been uncovered and fully reported.
    2. 1 Plastic Surgeon report.
    3. 3 Reports from our Handwriting Analyst for 3 documents submitted to him. After this process is completed we want to submit the Tradition-in-Action “Third Secret” for scientific analysis.
  3. Brief biographies of each expert consulted as well as their qualifications.
  4. We are creating a presentation which will be given to private audiences—private, so as not to interfere with the ongoing investigation—concerning all of the most recent findings of the Sister Lucy Truth investigation. One conference has already lined up this presentation.
..
 
Last edited:

Admin

Administrator
Is this the Interview that Caused Her Disappearance and Replacement? This is Why we at Sister Lucy Truth are Tentatively Establishing the Transition from Sister Lucy I to Sister Lucy II at 1958 to 1959.

1900
"Men are in imminent danger" 1947, Age 40

1901
"Glad the Window to the World Was Opened by Good Pope John!"1967, Age 60
Dr. Chojnowski: As far as we are aware, having discovered hundreds of photos of Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II, there are no photos of Sister Lucy between the years 1949 (i.e., Sister Lucy I) to her (i.e., Sister Lucy II) appearance with Paul VI at Fatima for the 50th Year Anniversary of the Fatima Apparitions on May 13th, 1967. Even though the investigation and the efforts of the investigator have not yet entered into the second part of the investigation, the part in which they try to discover what happened to the real Sister Lucy dos Santos and who the imposter was who they put out as "Sister Lucy" from 1967 on, we do believe that the real Sister Lucy was alive through the end of 1957 and even through most of 1958, primarily because of the interview which Tradition in Action has translated and which appears below. The persistent theme of this interview is that Mankind needs to take seriously the apparitions of Our Lady and her Messages in order to avoid the terrible Chastisements that Our Lord will reek upon the world on account of its sins and because of the way in which His Holy Mother is treated by the world and ignored by the world. The woman who gave this interview in the last days of 1957 was the sorrowful messenger of the Mother of God who wept because she knew about the punishment that was coming to Mankind after 1960. For all the posted evidence so far see: https://sisterlucyimposter.org


For the Last Interview of Sister Lucy in 1957, see below:
https://traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g23ht_Interview.html


Sister Lucy’s Last Public Interview - 1957
Fr. Augustin Fuentes

1906


A reader recently noted that the interview Sister Lucy gave to Fr. Augustin Fuentes in 1957, is always partially reported, and asked TIA if we could post the full text. To assist in this request we are now posting the most complete text available of the 1957 interview with our own translation from the original Spanish. Fr. Augustín Fuentes was the Mexican priest named vice-postulator of the cause of beatification for Francisco and Jacinta. In that interview Sr. Lucy said that Our Lady told her: “The last means that God will give to the world for its salvation are the Holy Rosary and My Immaculate Heart.”

This important conversation of December 26, 1957 was the last public interview of Sr. Lucy. After it, permission was refused for any other interviews and she was effectively silenced and completely hidden away for the next several decades.

Another very jovial Sr. Lucy appeared 10 years later in 1967 during Paul VI’s visit to Fatima. This Sr. Lucy, square-faced, cheerful and robust – incredibly different from the oval faced, sad and pale Sr. Lucy who spoke to Fr. Fuentes - was seen more regularly starting in 1982, after John Paul II’s visit to Fatima. [See our Two Sister Lucys' analysis]

These are the authentic words of her 1957 conversation with Fr. Fuentes, which came from the records of the official archivist of Fatima, Fr. Joaquín María Alonso, CMF. Fr. Alonso spoke with Sr. Lucy and publicly testified that her statements to Fr. Fuentes in 1957 were genuine and true.
This text is from his book, La verdad sobre el Secreto de Fátima, Fátima sin mitos [The Truth about the Secret of Fatima without Myths ]. The text has the approval and imprimatur of Archbishop Sánchez of Santa Cruz, Mexico.

What follows is the literal translation of Fr. Fuentes' text reporting what he heard "from the lips of" the seer of Fatima. TIA


Interview of December 26, 1957
Speaking to the sisters of Motherhouse of the Missionaries of the Sacred Heart in Mexico on May 22, 1958, Fr. Fuentes said, “I want to tell you the last conversation I had with her [Sister Lucy], which was on December 26 of last year. It was in the convent, where I found her very sad, pale and drawn.”

He then proceeded to read Sister’s Lucy’s words to him at the December 26, 1957, interview:
“Father, the Blessed Virgin is very sad because no one has paid attention to her Message, neither the good nor the bad. The good, because they continue on the road of goodness, but without paying mind to this Message. The bad, because of their sins, do not see God’s chastisement already falling on them presently; they also continue on their path of badness, ignoring the Message. But, Father, you must believe me that God is going to punish the world and chastise it in a tremendous way.

“The chastisement from Heaven is imminent. The year 1960 is on us, and then what will happen? It will be very sad for everyone, and far from a happy thing if the world does not pray and do penance before then. I cannot give more details, because it is still a secret. By the will of the Blessed Virgin, only the Holy Father and the Bishop of Fatima can know the secret. Both have chosen, however, not to open it in order not to be influenced by it. (1)

“This is the third part of the Message of Our Lady, which still remains secret until 1960. Tell them, Father, that the Blessed Virgin said repeatedly – to my cousins Francisco and Jacinta as well as to me – that many nations would disappear from the face of the earth, that Russia would be the instrument of chastisement from Heaven for the whole world if the conversion of that poor Nation is not obtained beforehand. …”


A decisive battle with the Devil
Sr. Lucy told me:
Father, the Devil is fighting a decisive battle against the Virgin and, as you know, what most offends God and what will gain him the greatest number of souls in the shortest time is to gain the souls consecrated to God. For this also leaves unprotected the field of the laity and the Devil can more easily seize them.

”Also, Father, tell them that my cousins Francisco and Jacinta made sacrifices because they always saw the Blessed Virgin was very sad in all her apparitions. She never smiled at us. This anguish that we saw in her, caused by offenses to God and the chastisements that threaten sinners, penetrated our souls. And being children, we did not know what measures to devise except to pray and make sacrifices. …”


We cannot wait for Rome to speak

Referring to the vision of Hell that Our Lady showed her and Jacinta and Francisco, she said:

“For this reason, Father, it is my mission not just to tell about the material punishments that will certainly come over the earth if the world does not pray and do penance. No, my mission is to tell everyone the imminent danger we are in of losing our souls for all eternity if we remain fixed in sin.

“Father, we should not wait for a call to the world from Rome on the part of the Holy Father to do penance. Nor should we wait for a call for penance to come from the Bishops in our Dioceses, nor from our Religious Congregations. No, Our Lord has often used these means, and the world has not paid heed. So, now each one of us must begin to reform himself spiritually. Each one has to save not only his own soul, but also all the souls that God has placed on his pathway."


Two last remedies to save the world


1904

“Father, the Blessed Virgin did not tell me that we are in the last times of the world, but I understood this for three reasons:

“The first is because she told me that the Devil is engaging in a battle with the Virgin, a decisive battle. It is a final battle where one party will be victorious and the other will suffer defeat. So, from now on, we are either with God or we are with the Devil; there is no middle ground.

“The second reason is because she told me, as well as my cousins, that God is giving two last remedies to the world: the Holy Rosary and devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. And, being the last remedies, that is to say, they are the final ones, means that there will be no others.

“And the third, because in the plans of the Divine Providence, when God is going to chastise the world He always first exhausts all other remedies. When He sees that the world pays no attention whatsoever, then, as we say in our imperfect way of talking, with a certain fear He presents us the last means of salvation, His Blessed Mother.

If we despise and reject this last means, Heaven will no longer pardon us, because we will have committed a sin that the Gospel calls a sin against the Holy Spirit. This sin consists in openly rejecting – with full knowledge and will – the salvation that is put in our hands.

“Also, since Our Lord is a very good Son, He will not permit that we offend and despise His Blessed Mother. We have as obvious testimony the history of different centuries where Our Lord has shown us with terrible examples how He has always defended the honor of His Blessed Mother.

“Prayer and sacrifice are the two means to save the world. As for the Holy Rosary, Father, in these last times in which we are living, the Blessed Virgin has given a new efficacy to the praying of the Holy Rosary. This in such a way that there is no problem that cannot be resolved by praying the Rosary, no matter how difficult it is - be it temporal or above all spiritual - in the spiritual life of each of us or the lives of our families, be they our families in the world or Religious Communities, or even in the lives of peoples and nations.

“I repeat, there is no problem, as difficult as it may be, that we cannot resolve at this time by praying the Holy Rosary. With the Holy Rosary we will save ourselves, sanctify ourselves, console Our Lord and obtain the salvation of many souls.

“Then, there is devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, our Most Holy Mother, holding her as the seat of mercy, goodness and pardon and the sure door to enter Heaven. This is the first part of the Message referring to Our Lady of Fatima, and the second part, which is briefer but no less important, refers to the Holy Father.”
Source
 
Last edited:

Admin

Administrator
1931
Francisco Marto, the Boy who Saw Our Lady at Fatima, Pray for
Sister Lucy Truth as We Inch Closer to the Truth.



On Centenary of the Death of Francisco of Fatima, New Photographic and Soon to be Published Handwriting Evidence
Fixes the Date of Sister Lucy I's Disappearance to the years 1958 to 1967. New Evidence Also Squarely
Implicates the Carmelite Convent at Coimbra in the Fraud.


Dr. Chojnowski: Along with being the centenary of the death of Francisco Marto of Fatima, a cousin of Sister Lucy dos Santos, it is also the second anniversary of the death of our beloved friend John Vennari. That he should die on this day shows us that God stitches together the details of our lives and even our deaths with the steady hand of His Providence in the most wonderful ways. John was devoted to Francisco and that such a man should die on the same day as did the Visionary of Fatima, an apparition to which John gave so much of his life, makes us weep with tears of gratitude. Rest in Peace John. Francisco pray for us that we may set aright the grave injustice that was perpetrated on your cousin Lucia. Our Lady promised you Heaven. Be at our side.

The latest coming into Sister Lucy Truth is very important and scientifically helps to identify both the fraud of the 1967 and after "Sister Lucy" but also DIRECTLY IMPLICATES THE CARMEL AT COIMBRA IN THE COVERUP AND SUBSTITUTION OF AN IMPOSTER FOR THE REAL SISTER LUCY. Soon to be published information, with the accompanying analysis and texts, prove that SOURCE TEXTS attributed to Sister Lucy, from which the "Pathways" book, published by the Carmel of Coimbra, is drawn, is an example of forgery. Also, what was that....the Carmelites of Coimbra are "Cooperators" of what organization........just saying.

Thanks to one of our readers and his access to later editions of the "Pathways" book, we have located pictures of the real Sister Lucy, some of which date from the early 50s and one of them is dated 1956. This gives photographic evidence for the fact that Sister Lucy was very much alive in 1956. This information can be placed alongside the seemingly authentic interview with Fr. Fuentes on December 26, 1957 to establish the real Sister Lucy as still being very much on the scene at least until 1958.

For the latest release of information from the Sister Lucy Truth investigation, sign up for email notification at sisterlucyimposter.org

..
 

Admin

Administrator

The Blue and Brown Conspiracy: Photographic Proof that the Blue Army, the Carmelites of Coimbra, and the Bishop of Coimbra Participated in the Identity Theft of Sister Lucy of Fatima. Wait Until You See the Handwriting Evidence That is SOON to Be Posted.


1937


Any problem here? In a book filled with dated photos and historical events which are illustrated by specific photos, here we have a clear deception. Under the general title of "Sister Lucia in the garden of the Carmel of Coimbra" we see put together undated photos of Sister Lucy II (on top) and Sister Lucy I (on the bottom). I guess we are supposed to believe the two individuals are the same
because of the "in the garden" bit.

1938
1939

Upper left photo shows the Sister Lucy I with the First Image of Our Lady of Fatima. This statue was give to here in or around 1947 and then made a pilgrimage through many countries. Photo at the bottom right shows Sister Lucy I with Bishop Ernesto Sena de Oliveira, along with Mother Prioress Sr. Maria de Cristo. Since Sr. Maria de Cristo was elected Mother Prioress no earlier than March 1951 and there is a letter by Sr. Lucy to the Bishop thanking him for his visit, dated April 26, 1952, the photo must date from the year 1952. This, along with the above photo from 1956, indicates that there are published and official pictures of Sister Lucy from the 1949 to the 1956 Period.

1940

1941

Third Edition, Published in Fatima in May 2017 by World Apostolate of Fatima (i.e., The Blue Army)​


Source

..
 
Last edited:

Admin

Administrator
From the "I Don't Know You!" File: New Book Testifies to the New Montinian Church Take-Over of Fatima on May 13, 1967. Paul VI Clearly Wanted to Make Fatima All About Him. Just as John Paul II Wanted to Make the Third Secret All About Himself and the Attempt on His Life.

May 21, 2019

Move Over Sister Lucy, You are Blocking the Crowd's View of Me!​




Sister, You are blocking the Camera!

Dr. Chojnowski: There is a short section from a newly published book entitled, Vatican II Exposed as Counterfeit Catholicism, written by two brothers who are priests of the CMRI, Fr. Francisco Radecki and Fr. Dominic Radecki, which directly concerns the strange "meeting" between Paul VI and the new woman who was being put forward as "Sister Lucy." What is clear from this information is that Paul VI intended to use the event of the 50th Anniversary of the Apparitions of Fatima, to hijack Fatima so that it could be used --- not to attack and undermine NewChurch --- but rather, to endorse it and "normalize" it in the minds of devote Catholics. Even though, as Frs. Radecki point out, Paul VI totally turned the entire event to his own agenda and paid little or no attention to the Fatima Message, the Conversion of Russia, the Apparition and its Content, or even, to "Sister Lucy." Here are some quotations from this section of Vatican II Exposed:

First, with regard to Paul VI interest in the contents of the Third Secret, we read, "After his election, Paul VI was curious about the contents of the Third Secret of Fatima. Since he did not know what John XXIII had done with it, he had Msgr. Capovilla, John XXIII's personal secretary, questioned and the later indicated the location where the manuscript had been placed. Pope Paul VI assuredly read it at that time. But he did not speak about it." (Cited in Vatican II Exposed, p. 272; cf. Brother Michael of the Holy Trinity, The Third Secret of Fatima, pp. 16-17.)

"May 13, 1967 marked the 50th anniversary of Our Lady's appearance at Fatima, Portugal. During Paul VI's half-hearted visit, he did not visit the place of the apparitions, the Cova da Iria, indicating to the world that he did not believe in the Blessed Virgin's message and its vital importance for our times. However, he had time to exchange a few meaningless words to Presbyterians in a prearranged ecumenical meeting where he downplayed Marian devotion."(Vatican II Exposed, p. 272)

"He resented having to travel to Fatima because he disliked Antonio Salazar, the Catholic anti-Communist ruler of Portugal and allowed no photo ops. He mentioned nothing about the Third Secret of Fatima and the conversion of Russia because he considered Catholic devotion to Mary extreme, unecumenical, and in conflict with the new theology.

In his Fatima speech Paul VI said, 'We want to ask from Mary, a living Church, a united Church, a holy Church." (Ibid.)

"He celebrated a hasty Mass in Portuguese that was impossible to follow and could best be described as filled with stammering or stuttering. The words of his speech on this important anniversary were not focused on the message of the Blessed Virgin Mary, but primarily concerned with Humanism, arms reduction, hunger, and Vatican II. Paul VI stated, 'The Ecumenical Council has vitalized the heart of the Church, has opened up new vistas in the field of doctrine....We desire that these be preserved and extended....Faith...must be renewed through the stimulus of science and progress.' (Cited in Vatican II Exposed, p. 273. Cf. Paul VI: Peregrino Da Paz Em Fatima, p. 38)."

"Television reporters and journalists were shocked that during his visit to this important international Marian shrine Paul VI had not even recited a single Hail Mary and never mentioned the Rosary. Since Paul VI was a Communist and a Modernist, he had come to Fatima to take center stage and promote his own agenda, not to honor the Mother of God." (Ibid.)

Even though Paul VI refused to meet with "Sister Lucia" in private for any amount of time, and only spoke to her in public for 3 minutes, "However, a few days earlier, May 7th, 1967, Paul VI had no trouble arranging a meeting at the Vatican with Italian movie stars Gina Lollobrigida and Claudia Cardinale." (Ibid. --- red text my own!)

"'In speaking to his confidant, Jean Guitton, Paul VI expressed his contempt for Sister Lucia, the only living witness to Our Lady's apparitions. He dismissed her as a 'simple peasant' for whom he had no time, this attitude being in keeping with his generic aversion to visionaries.'" (Cited in Vatican II Exposed, p. 273. Cf. Antonio Socci, Il Quarto Segreto di Fatima, pp. 209-211.)

"After Paul VI's return from Rome, the Vatican Radio summarized his visit: 'Paul VI purified devotion to Our Lady of Fatima. He swept away the atmosphere of secrecy, of political and social exploitation, of false mystery, of whisperings and gossip. In his discourses the Pope made no mention of the mysterious Fatima that intellectuals had exploited to put forward their own ideas under the cover of Our Lady.'" (Vatican II Exposed, p. 273. Cf. Peter Hebblethwaite, The Runaway Church, pp. 90-91).

Interestingly enough, 12 days after his "meeting" with "Sister Lucy" in Fatima, Paul VI made Bishop Karol Wojtyla a Cardinal. John Paul II would be the one who would make the Third Secret about himself. It seems as if the fatest fingers in the hijacking of Fatima, can be pointed at John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II.

All the above quotations come from Frs. Francisco and Dominic Radecki, CMRI. Vatican II Exposed as Counterfeit Catholicism (Wayne, MI: St. Joseph's Media, 2019).

Source

..
 
Last edited:

Admin

Administrator
HANDWRITING ANALYSIS
Bart Baggett is among the world’s leading forensic handwriting experts. From Mr. Baggett’s curriculum vitae:
He is a skilled authority in handwriting identification and has examined over 14,000 documents as part of over 880 cases. He is a court qualified expert witness in the field of questioned documents within the states of California, Texas, Alaska, Nevada, and Arizona.
Sister Lucy Truth turned to his expertise to analyze a sizable set of handwriting samples from Sister Lucy in order to detect any differences. In his analysis, he concludes that the submitted document sample written by the post-1967 Sr. Lucy was “highly likely a document written by another person with many similar characteristics in letter form and letter structure.”
Below you will find the following documents that may be downloaded:
  1. The three handwriting analysis reports that the Sister Lucy Truth project commissioned Bart Baggett to complete. Please note that Report 1 was previously uploaded here and has now been revised and expanded based on further analysis by Mr. Baggett.
  2. The packet of examined handwriting samples used for Mr. Baggett’s first report, documents Q1-Q5.
  3. The packet of signature samples that are the subject of the second report.
  4. The packet of post-1969 writings and the April 13, 1980 letter from Sr. Lucy II to Fr. Umberto Pasquale, which are examined in Baggett’s third report.
  5. The remainder of handwriting samples known to be written by Sr. Lucy I against which Mr. Baggett was able to analyze and compare later forgeries. Mr. Baggett has authenticated these samples as being from a single person distinct from Sr. Lucy II’s handwriting.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE THREE HANDWRITING ANALYSIS REPORTS BY BART BAGGETT
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE HANDWRITING SAMPLES ANALYZED IN REPORT 1
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE SIGNATURE SAMPLES ANALYZED IN REPORT 2
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE SAMPLES AND 1980 LETTER ANALYZED IN REPORT 3
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE KNOWN HANDWRITING SAMPLES OF THE REAL SR. LUCY



FROM BART BAGGETT'S DECLARATION

EXCERPT FROM REPORT 1
I, BART BAGGETT, hereby declare: 1. I am over the age of eighteen (18) and I am not a party to the matter of The Writing of Irma Lucia. If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify to all of the facts, statements and opinions set forth in this declaration and the attached exhibit based on my personal knowledge except where based on my information and belief, and, as to matters stated on my information and belief, I believe them to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

2. REQUEST
I am submitting my declaration to advise the Court of my conclusion regarding the authenticity of the handwriting of IRMA LUCIA on a four-page Handwritten Letter dated January 3, 1944 and a one-page Handwritten Letter dated December 27, 1969.

3. ATTACHMENTS
Attached to this Declaration are the letters which are the questioned documents of IRMA LUCIA, labeled as ‘Q1 through Q5’, which is true and correct. The known documents of IRMA LUCIA are attached and labeled as ‘K1 through K101’, which is true and correct. Attached to this Declaration are the documents labeled as ‘EXHIBIT A,’ which is my Curriculum Vitae, which is true and correct.

4. QUESTIONED DOCUMENT(S) (ATTACHED AS Q1 THROUGH Q5)
Q1-Q4 High-quality color photocopies of a four-page Handwritten Letter dated January 3, 1944 containing the alleged handwriting of IRMA LUCIA.
Q5 A one-page copy of a one-page Handwritten Letter dated December 27, 1969 containing the alleged handwriting and signature of IRMA LUCIA.

6. BASIS OF OPINION
The basis for handwriting identification is that writing habits are not instinctive or hereditary but are complex processes that are developed gradually through habit and that handwriting is unique to each individual. Further, the basic axiom is that no one person writes exactly the same way twice and no two people write exactly the same. Thus, writing habits or individual characteristics distinguish one person’s handwriting from another. A process of analysis, comparison and evaluation is conducted between the known standards and questioned document(s). Overall class characteristics from native Portuguese writers of the time period were also a consideration. The conclusions of the expert opinions are derived from the ASTM Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions for Forensic Document Examiners.

BART BAGGETT'S DECLARATION CONTINUED

7. OBSERVATIONS
a. Similarities between the known writing of Irma Lucia and Q1-Q4 include, but are not limited to:
v. The scissor-like angles at the baseline which form connectors between letters. This is a unique and consistent pattern which also helps reveal the overall rhythm of the writing. The spaces and sharp angles are consistent in the known writing.
1. The unique baseline arcades and overall rhythm of the Q5 document is one of the significant differences that lead to my conclusion (that differs from my conclusion for Q1-Q4) on this document.
vi. The unique starting point and formation of the lowercase ‘p’. This is observable in the entire the phrase “parte do segredo” which appears in both the known Manuscript (K92) and questioned document (Q1). This side-by-side comparison is useful to see the spacing, letter connections, and letter formations.
SAMPLES

viii. The formation of the capital letter ‘P’;
1. This formation has a slight variation between the known documents and the Q5.

b. Differences between the known writing of Irma Lucia and Q5 include, but are not limited to:
i. The Q5 document has a loop on the lowercase letter ‘d’, but the shape is much more narrow, often closed, and pointed. This is a common class characteristic of the time period, so the details of the formation are much more relevant than merely the existence of such a loop in a writing from this time period. The swooped d-loop is a significant difference.
ii. The Q5 document contains many vertically-slanted upstrokes on the lowercase letters ‘t’ and ‘l’. This is a significant difference than the consistent rightward-slanted formations of the hundreds of pages of known exemplars.
iii. The baseline of the Q5 document is significantly less organized, rhythmic, and linear than the known writing samples;
iv. The capital letter ‘P’ is not formed with a circular bowl as seen in the known writing;
v. The capital ‘F’ in the Q5 document contains a curved top bar and downstroke which is not consistent with the known writer’s formation of the capital letter ‘F’. The known writer uses three distinct strokes to form the ‘F’, not two.
vi. The final stroke of the loop on the lower zone letters ‘g’, ‘j’, and ‘y’ have a curve and seem to be longer, fuller, and overall slightly different in formation from that of the known documents.
vii. The words printed in lowercase in the 11th line from the bottom on Q5 (which contains the word “Esperanca”) is a variation in writing formation within the questioned document that is unaccounted for. The printed letters do not match the writer of the rest of the questioned document.
c. The differences between the handwriting on Q5 and the known documents of Irma Lucia are not the result of typical decreases in muscular movement related to diseases of old age or simply the number of years between reliable samples. While many strokes and letters are consistent with the “class characteristics”, the overall rhythm and baselines and connections are not consistent with the same writer.

8. OPINION
Based upon my thorough analysis of these items, and from an application of accepted forensic document examination tools, principals and techniques, my professional expert opinions are as follows:
It has been determined that IRMA LUCIA has been identified as the author of questioned documents, Q1 through Q4.
It is highly probable that IRMA LUCIA did not write the questioned document, Q5. This is highly likely a document written by another person with many similar characteristics in letter form and letter structure. It is not possible to know if this is the author’s natural signature, or it was intentionally created to look similar to the author’s known writing.
9. DECLARATION
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 31st day of December 2018, in Sherman Oaks, California 91403.

BART BAGGETT, DECLARANT.

..
.
 

Admin

Administrator
SISTER LUCY TRUTH


AN INDICTMENT
Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima and the Woman Who Replaced Her

We at Sister Lucy Truth publicly declare that based on the evidence presented here, we have found it to be morally and scientifically certain that the woman portrayed to the world as “Sister Lucy,” from her first public appearance on May 13, 1967 to her death on February 13, 2005, was not the same person as Sister Lucy, Seer of Fatima and Visionary who predicted the Miracle of the Sun on October 13, 1917.
This, one of the greatest frauds in the history of the Church, was discovered through the use of the most sophisticated facial recognition programs available, along with the accumulated testimony of plastic surgeons, orthodontists, forensic artists, private investigators, handwriting analysts, and facial recognition experts. Due to the availability of hundreds of photos of “Sister Lucy” available on the internet and in authoritative biographies, this case of substitution, fraud, and stolen identity has been able to be uncovered and analyzed. Without the judgment of the best and most relevant professionals available, we would not be making this grave accusation and presenting this charge. We will continue to accumulate and post on this site new studies and research concerning this investigation as they are produced and published. All of the names of the relevant experts shall be published along with their professional findings. The truth of the disappearance of the true Sister Lucy and the identity of the imposter who took her place shall be placed before an internationally based private investigator who will investigate and solve the case.



The fraud has been identified and named. We charge the highest officials in the Vatican with conspiracy to perpetuate and conceal the substitution of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima with an as yet unknown Imposter.


..​
 

Admin

Administrator
Amazon Facial Recognition Technology Determines that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II are not the Same Person. Not One Match Amidst Thousands of Comparisons.

Posted: 16 Jul 2019 09:55 PM PDT

Begin forwarded message:




2418


"NOT EQUAL"​


The above message was sent to Sister Lucy Truth as the announcement of the result of the Amazon Facial Recognition Test. All of the data, with pictures and percentage identified similarity and matches to be released along with Investigators report soon. A further summary of all the data from this test will be released by Sister Lucy Truth in the coming weeks.

Watch the Youtube below about this latest Amazon technology that is being used by police departments all over the nation.


..​
 

Admin

Administrator
1564141816862.png


Super-Recognizer Page Updated
We don't intend to spam your inbox with overly frequent emails, but we felt this small update was important enough to warrant bringing it to your attention!

Thanks to the diligence of one of our readers, we have updated the Super-Recognizer Report page to include the link to the second video, which features the elderly, post-1967 Sr. Lucy between between :30 and 2:00. We had mistyped the original URL and had mistakenly believed that the video had been removed.

Read the Super-Recognizer Report here.


__________________________________________________



What is a Super-Recognizer?
Super-recognizers (SRs) are individuals who are extremely proficient at processing facial identity.
— “Super-Recognizers: From the Lab to the World and Back Again” (2019), British Journal of Psychology

READ A REVIEW OF THE CURRENT SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE ON SUPER-RECOGNIZERS HERE.

Our discovery of super-recognizers demonstrates that people can not only be much worse than average at face recognition (as in developmental prosopagnosia), but also much better than average.
— “Super-Recognizers: People with Extraordinary Face Recognition Ability” (2009), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

READ THE SEMINAL WORK DISCUSSING SUPER-RECOGNIZERS AND FACIAL RECOGNITION ABILITY HERE.


Full report

..
 
Last edited:
Top