Sr. Lucy fraud exposed : Part II



Was the Real Sister Lucy of Fatima Living in 1960? The Press Release from
February 1960 Says YES, Simple Logic Says NO.
- June 28, 2020

The Vatican’s #1 Reason for Not Disclosing the Third Secret of Fatima in 1960:

At Sister Lucy Truth, we’ve endeavored to scientifically and methodically prove that the woman who appeared before the world in 1967 as “Sister Lucy” was not the actual seer of Fatima. During the course of this study, the question of “why” constantly arises. Why would enemies of the Church go to the trouble of putting an imposter into place?

One answer: To justify the decision not to release the Third Secret of Fatima in 1960.
The entire world waited on edge as 1960 approached knowing that 1960 represented the disclosure of the last part of the Message of Fatima, the so-called Third Secret of Fatima. Yet, on February 8, 1960, in a bewildering turn of events, a Portuguese news agency, A.N.I., issued a press release, reproduced in its entirety below, stating that “Vatican sources…in very reliable Vatican circles” advised that the Third Secret most likely “will never be opened.”

Interestingly, A.N.I. recounted that the “decision of the Vatican is based on various reasons. 1. Sister Lucy is still living. 2. The Vatican already knows the contents of the letter. 3. Although the Church recognizes the Fatima apparitions, she does not pledge herself to guarantee the veracity of the words which the three little shepherds claim to have heard from Our Lady. In these, circumstances, it is most probable that the Secret of Fatima will remain, forever, under absolute seal.”

On its face, using the justification that “Sister Lucy is still living” as the first cited reason for nondisclosure is strange. It was well known that 1960 was the year to release the Secret—many reliable sources reported this fact. For example, Canon Galamba wrote that the Secret “will be opened either after the see’s death or at the latest in 1960.” There was no evidence that absence of Sister Lucy’s death somehow extended the period of time to disclose the Secret.

However, the benefit of hindsight and results of the Sister Lucy Truth investigation cast a new light upon this suspicious statement. A decision to not release the Third Secret would have massive ramifications and even a revolt of sorts within the Church. Therefore, here, we see the first time—and certainly not the last—where the Vatican would thrust the personage of Sister Lucy forward and say, “See! She’s alive and well and tacitly approves of what we choose to do. If you disagree, then you disagree with the messenger of Heaven!”

Using “Sister Lucy” as a human shield to deflect the forthcoming barbs indicates that those in the Vatican must have had a high degree of certitude their “still living” “Sister Lucy” would not speak against their complete twisting of the 1960 timeframe. Yet, this confidence would seem misplaced given the fact that Sister Lucy’s recent, explosive December 26, 1957 interview with Fr. Fuentes demonstrated that the real Sister Lucy spoke freely and with complete urgency about the state of the world and the need for souls to heed the warnings of Fatima. Consequently, it would certainly seem that something significant changed since the time of the Fr. Fuentes interview.

Could it be that the Sister Lucy was, in fact, no longer “still living”?

Yes, ironically, this “#1 reason—Sister Lucy is still living” justification not to disclose the Third Secret may be, in reality, a clear indication that the real Sister Lucy was certainly dead by the time of the February 8, 1960 press release. If this is true, then the Fraud in Fatima began sometime between December 26, 1957 and February 8, 1960. Piece by piece we will continue to solve this mystery and will not stop until this crime against the faith is fully laid bare!

The text below is from The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. III by Frere Michel of the Holy Trinity.





How Could the Fact that Sister Lucy was "Still Living" be an Excuse for Not Revealing the Third Secret? Actually, if We Were Not Dealing With a Criminal Conspiracy, this Fact would DEMAND that the Secret Be Released Immediately.

- July 01, 2020




Avoiding the Elephant in the Room, Carlos Evaristo Threatens Lawsuit Against Sister Lucy Truth Because of a Posting of a Picture of the 1992 Interview with the Imposter Sister Lucy. Says he never said that it was not the real Sister Lucy. Was Dr. Zugibe lying? But if he lied about this, maybe he lied when he said that the woman who purported to be "Sister Lucy" from 1967 through 2005 WAS NOT the real Sister Lucy.


But if he lied about this, maybe he lied when he said that the woman whose pictures he analyzed WAS the real Sister Lucy of Fatima. In this blog post commentary, Evaristo nullifies the only "study" which said that the woman who came forward in 1992-1993 WAS identical to the real Sister Lucy of Fatima. Sister Lucy Truth about a dozen, Fake Sister Lucy 0.

Why would Evaristo blanch at anyone using such an ostentatious picture with him standing next to Sister Lucy of Fatima, one of the privileged few who the Vatican let in since 1959?

The person you have put forward as the real Sister Lucy of Fatima has now been determined to NOT be that person at all.................BUT LOOK HE IS USING A COPYRIGHTED PICTURE!!!!!!! Oh, no!!!!!!!

Here is Carlos Evaristo's post on this site:

I never said that this was not Sister Lucia and never authorized anyone to use this copyrighted photo on this website. Please remove it immediately or face legal action. Sincerely Carlos Evaristo

Here is the article from the Wanderer, republished by EWTN which says that the Portuguese police sent Carlos Evaristo to Dr. Frederich Zugibe when Evaristo suspected that the woman he met with in 1992 and 1993 was NOT the real Sister Lucy:

Here is the specific part of the article that I am referring to:

S.M. Doctor, this not about your credibility — how would you answer those people who claim that the person presented to you was not Sr. Lucia?
Dr. Z. Such a claim would be totally preposterous. I will tell you why it was Sr. Lucia. A number of years ago, I was asked — one time someone asked me — they said they had met Sr. Lucia and wrote an article about Sr. Lucia — a fellow by the name of Carlos Everisto. He wrote several books over there, of sights in Fatima. He had written a letter to the chief of police and said that he had written an article about Sr. Lucia, and had a picture of himself with her. He thought that it was not Sr. Lucia. He wanted to know if the chief of police knew any forensic specialist who could compare that picture with known pictures of Sr. Lucia.

He came to me, and I went ahead and did a complete study, called an anthropomorphic study, of the photos showing that it was definitely the same person. I'm very, very familiar with what Sr. Lucia looks like after looking at a whole big bunch of pictures — I know exactly what she looks like, in all ways.




Lista Pecorelli: Were these involved in Vatican Penetration But Not Involved with
the Murder/Disappearance and Imposture of Sister Lucy of Fatima?

- July 27, 2020


“Pecorelli’s List:” Alleged Freemasons in the Vatican

From, also published in Chiesa Viva by Fr. Luigi Villa, personally commissioned by Pope Pius XII and Padre Pio to uncover Masonic infiltration of the Catholic Church at the highest levels.

See, The Pecorelli list alleges the presence of Freemasons in the upper ranks of the Vatican II Church (prohibited and causing excommunication). The list was published by Carmine Pecorelli, a member of Propaganda Due and the Grande Oriente d’Italia, purporting to be a list of 120 masons in or associated with Vatican dicasteries, including cardinals, bishops and priests as well as members of the laity. It included Cardinal Jean Villot and Cardinal Agostino Casaroli who were Secretary of State in the Vatican City. Pecorelli himself was murdered shortly after in March 1979.

*Each man’s name is followed by his position, if known; the date he was allegedly initiated into Masonry, his code #; and his code name, if known:
*Alberto Albondi. Bishop of Livorno, (Leghorn). Initiated 8-5-58; I.D. # 7-2431.
*Pio Abrech In the Sacred Congregation Bishops. 11-27-67; # 63-143.
*Sabino Acquaviva. Professor of Religion at the University of Padova, (Padua). 12-3-69;# 275-69.
*Gottardi Alessandro. (Addressed as Doctor in Masonic meetings.) President of Fratelli Maristi. 6-14-59.
*Fiorenzo Angelini. Bishop of Messenel, Greece. 10-14-57; # 14-005.
*Benedetto Argentieri. Patriarch to the Holy See. 3-11-70; # 298-A.
*Augustin Bea. Cardinal. Secretary of State (next to Pope) under Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI.
Sebastiano Baggio. Cardinal. Prefect of the Sacred Congregation of Bishops. (This is a crucial Congregation since it appoints new Bishops.) Secretary of State under Pope John Paul II from 1989 to 1992. 8-14-57; # 85-1640. Masonic code name “SEBA.” He controls consecration of Bishops.
*Dante Balboni. Assistant to the Vatican Pontifical . Commission for Biblical Studies. 7-23-68; # 79-14 “BALDA.”
*Salvatore Baldassarri. Bishop of Ravenna, Italy. 2-19-58; # 4315-19. “BALSA.”
*Ernesto Balducci. Religious sculpture artist. 5-16-66; # 1452-3.
*Ernesto Basadonna. Prelate of Milan, 9-14-63; # 9-243. “BASE.”
*Guilio Batelli. Lay member of many scientific academies. 8-24-59; # 29-A. “GIBA.”
*Lorenzo Bedeschi. 2-19-59; # 24-041. “BELO.”
*Luigi Belloli. Rector of Seminar; Lombardy, Ita- ly. 4-6-58; # 22-04. “BELLU.”
*Cleto Belluchi. Coadjutor Bishop of Fermo, Italy. 6-4-68; # 12-217.
*Luigi Bettazzi. Bishop of Ivera, Italy. 5-11-66; # 1347-45. “LUBE.”
*Giovanni Bianchi. 10-23-69; # 2215-11. “BIGI.”
*Franco Biffi. Msgr, Rector of Church of St. John Lateran Pontifical University. He is head of this University and controls what is being taught. He heard confessions of Pope Paul VI. 8-15-59. “BIFRA.”
*Mario Bicarella. Prelate of Vicenza, Italy. 9-23-64; # 21-014. “BIMA.”
*Gaetano Bonicelli. Bishop of Albano, Italy. 5-12-59; # 63-1428, “BOGA.”
*Giancarlo Boretti. 3-21-65; # 0-241. “BORGI.”
*Alberto Bovone. Substitute Secretary of the Sacred Office. 3-30-67; # 254-3. “ALBO.”
*Mario Brini. Archbishop. Secretary of Chinese, Oriental, and Pagans. Member of Pontifical Commission to Russia. Has control of rewriting Canon Law. 7-7-68; # 15670. “MABRI.”
*Annibale Bugnini. Archbishop. Wrote Novus Ordo Mass. Envoy to Iran, 4-23-63; # 1365-75. “BUAN.”
*Michele Buro. Bishop. Prelate of Pontifical Commission to Latin America, 3-21-69; # 140-2. “BUMI.”
*Agostino Cacciavillan. Secretariat of State. 11-6-60; # 13-154.
*Umberto Cameli. Director in Office of the Ecclesiastical Affairs of Italy in regard to education in Catholic doctrine. 11-17-60; # 9-1436.
*Giovanni Caprile. Director of Catholic Civil Affairs. 9-5-57; # 21-014. “GICA.”
*Giuseppe Caputo. 11-15-71; # 6125-63. “GICAP.”
*Agostino Casaroli. Cardinal. Secretary of State (next to Pope) under Pope John Paul II since July 1, 1979 until retired in 1989. 9-28-57; # 41-076. “CASA.”
*Flamino Cerruti. Chief of the Office of the University of Congregation Studies. 4-2-60; # 76-2154. “CEFLA.”
*Mario Ciarrocchi. Bishop. 8-23-62; # 123-A. “CIMA.”
*Enrico Chiavacci. Professor of Moral Theology, University of Florence, Italy. 7-2-70; # 121-34. “CHIE.”
*Carmelo Conte. 9-16-67; # 43-096. “CONCA.”
*Alessandro Csele. 3-25-60; # 1354-09. “ALCSE.”
*Luigi Dadagio. Papal Nuncio to Spain. Archbishop of Lero. 9-8-67. # 43-B. “LUDA.”
*Enzio D’Antonio. Archbishop of Trivento. 6-21-69; # 214-53.
*Donate De Bous. Bishop. 6-24-68; # 321-02. “DEBO.”
*Luigi Del Gallo Reoccagiovane. Bishop.
*Aldo Del Monte. Bishop of Novara, Italy. 8-25-69; # 32-012. “ADELMO.”
*Danielle Faltin. 6-4-70; # 9-1207. “FADA.”
*Giuseppe Ferraioli. Member of Sacred Congregation for Public Affairs. 11-24-69; # 004-125. “GIFE.”
*Giovanni Franzoni. 3-2-65; # 2246-47. “FRAGI.”
*Vito Gemmiti. Sacred Congregation of Bishops. 3-25-68; # 54-13. “VIGE.”
*Giulio Girardi. 9-8-70; # 1471-52. “GIG.”
*Angelinin Fiorenzo. Bishop. Title of Commendator of the Holy Spirit. Vicar General of Roman Hospitals. Controls hospital trust funds. Consecrated Bishop 7-19-56; joined Masons 10-14-57.
*Massimo Giustetti. 4-12-70; # 13-065. “GIUMA.”
*Alessandro Gottardi. Procurator and Postulator General of Fratelli Maristi. Archbishop of Trent. 6-13-59; # 2437-14. “ALGO.”
*Mario Gozzini. 5-14-70; # 31-11. “MAGO.”
*Carlo Grazinai. Rector of the Vatican Minor Seminary. 7-23-61; # 156-3. “GRACA.”
*Antonio Gregagnin. Tribune of First Causes for Beatification. 10-19-67; # 8-45. “GREA.”
*Franco Gualdrini. Rector of Capranica. 5-22-61; # 21-352. “GUFRA.”
*Annibale Ilari. Abbot. 3-16-69; # 43-86. “ILA.”
*Pio Laghi. Nunzio, Apostolic Delegate to Argentina, and then to U.S.A. until 1995. 8-24-69; # 0-538. “LAPI.”
*Giovanni Lajolo. Member of Council of Public Affairs of the Church. 7-27-70; # 21-1397. “LAGI.”
*Angelo Lanzoni. Chief of the Office of Secretary of State. 9-24-56; # 6-324. “LANA.”
*Virgilio Levi (alias Levine), Monsignor. Assistant Director of Official Vatican Newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano. Manages Vatican Radio Station. 7-4-58; # 241-3. “VILE.”
*Lino Lozza. Chancellor of Rome Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas of Catholic Religion. 7-23-69; # 12-768. “LOLI.”
*Achille Lienart. Cardinal. Grand Master top Mason. Bishop of Lille, France. Recruits Masons. Was leader of progressive forces at Vatican II Council.
*Pasquale Macchi. Cardinal. Pope Paul’s Prelate of Honour and Private Secretary until he was excommunicated for heresy by Pope Paul VI. Was reinstated by Secretary of
State Jean Villot, and made a Cardinal. 4-23-58; # 5463-2. “MAPA.”
*Italo Mancini. Director of Sua Santita. 3-18-68; # l551-142. “MANI.”
*Enrico Manfrini. Lay Consultor of Pontifical Commission of Sacred Art. 2-21-68; # 968-c. “MANE.”
*Francesco Marchisano. Prelate Honour of the Pope. Secretary Congregation for Seminaries and Universities of Studies. 2-4-61; 4536-3. “FRAMA.”
*Paul Marcinkus. American bodyguard for imposter Pope. From Cicero, Illinois. Stands 6’4″. President for Institute for Training Religious. 8-21-67; # 43-649. Called “GORILLA.” Code name “MARPA.”
*Saltvatore Marsili. Abbot of Order of St. Benedict of Finalpia near Modena, Italy. 7-2-63; # 1278-49. “SALMA.”
*Antonio Mazza. Titular Bishop of Velia. Secretary General of Holy Year, 1975. 4-14-71. # 054-329. “MANU.”
*Venerio Mazzi. Member of Council of Public Affairs of the Church. 10-13-66; # 052-s. “MAVE.”
*Pier Luigi Mazzoni. Congregation of Bishops. 9-14-59; # 59-2. “PILUM.”
*Luigi Maverna. Bishop of Chiavari, Genoa, Italy. Assistant General of Italian Catholic Azione. 6-3-68; # 441-c. “LUMA.”
*Albino Mensa. Archbishop of Vercelli, Piedmont, Italy. 7-23-59; # 53-23. ” MENA.”
*Carlo Messina. 3-21-70; # 21-045. “MECA.”
*Zanon Messina (Adele). 9-25-68; # 045-329. ” AMEZ.”
*Dino Monduzzi. Regent to the Prefect of the Pontifical House. 3-11 -67; # 190-2. “MONDI.”
*Daimazio Mongillo. Professor of Dominican Moral Theology, Holy Angels Institute of Roma. 2-16-69; # 2145-22. “MONDA.”
*Marcello Morgante. Bishop of Ascoli Piceno in East Italy. 7-22-55; # 78-3601. MORMA.”
*Teuzo Natalini. Vice President of the Archives of Secretariat of the Vatican. 6-17-67; # 21-44d. “NATE.”
*Carmelo Nigro. Rector of the Seminary, Pontifical of Major Studies. 12-21-70; # 23-154. “CARNI.”
*Virgillio Noe. Head of the Sacred Congregation of Divine Worship. He and Bugnini paid 5 Protestant Ministers and one Jewish Rabbi to create the Novus Ordo Mass. 4-3-61; # 43652-21. “VINO.”
*Vittorie Palestra. He is Legal Council of the Sacred Rota of the Vatican State. 5-6-43; # 1965. “PAVI.”
*Salvatore Pappalardo. Cardinal. Archbishop of Palermo, Sicily. 4-15-68; # 234-07. “SALPA.”
*Gottardo Pasqualetti. 6-15-60; # 4-231. “COPA.”
*Dante Pasquinelli. Council of Nunzio of Madrid. 1-12-69; # 32-124. “PADA.”
*Michele Pellegrino. Cardinal. Called “Protector of the Church”, Archbishop of Torino (Turin, where the Holy Shroud of Jesus is kept). 5-2-60; # 352-36. “PALMI.”
*Giannino Piana. 9-2-70; # 314-52. “GIPI.”
*Mario Pimpo. Vicar of Office of General Affairs. 3-15-70; # 793-43. “PIMA.”
*Pio Vito Pinto. Monsignor, Attache of Secretary of State and Notare of Second Section of Supreme Tribunal and of Apostolic Signature. 4-2-70; # 3317-42. “PIPIVI.”
*Ugo Poletti. Cardinal. Vicar of S.S. Diocese of Rome. Controls clergy of Rome since 3-6-73. Member of Sacred Congregation of Sacraments and of Divine Worship. He is President of Pontifical Works and Preservation of the Faith. Also President of the Liturgical Academy. 2-17-69; # 32-1425. “UPO.”
*Mario Rizzi. Monsignor, Sacred Congregation of Oriental Rites. Listed as “Prelate Bishop of Honour of the Holy Father, the Pope.” Works under top-Mason Mario Brini in manipulating Canon Law. 9-16-69; # 43-179. “MARI,” “MONMARI.”
*Florenzo Romita. Was in Sacred Congregation of Clergy. 4-21-56; # 52-142. “FIRO.”
*Igine Rogger. Officer in S.S. (Diocese of Rome). 4-16-68; # 319-13. “IGRO.”
*Pietro Rossano. Sacred Congregation of Non-Christian Religions. 2-12-68; # 3421-a. “PIRO.”
*Virgillio Rovela. 6-12-64; # 32-14. “ROVI.”
*Aurelio Sabbatani. Archbishop of Giustiniana (Giusgno, Milar Province, Italy). First Secretary Supreme Apostolic Segnatura. 6-22-69; # 87-43. “ASA”
*Guilio Sacchetti. Delegate of Governors – Marchese. 8-23-59; # 0991-b. “SAGI.”
*Francesco Salerno. Bishop. Prefect Atti. Eccles. 5-4-62; # 0437-1. “SAFRA”
*Francesco Santangelo. Substitute General of Defense Legal Counsel. 11-12-70; # 32-096. “FRASA.”
*Pietro Santini. Vice Official of the Vicar. 8-23-64; # 326-11. “SAPI.”
*Ferdnando Savorelli. 1-14-69; # 004-51. “SAFE.”
*Renzo Savorelli. 6-12-65; # 34-692. “RESA.”
*Gaetano Scanagatta. Sacred Congregation of the Clergy. Member of Commission of Pomei and Loreto, Italy. 9-23-71; # 42-023. “GASCA.”
*Giovanni Schasching. 3-18-65; # 6374-23. “GISCHA,” “GESUITA.”
*Mario Schierano. Titular Bishop of Acrida (Acri in Cosenza Province, Italy.) Chief Military Chaplain of the Italian Armed Forces. 7-3-59; #14-3641. “MASCHI.”
*Domenico Semproni. Tribunal of the Vicarate of the Vatican. 4-16-60; # 00-12. “DOSE.” Sensi, Giuseppe Mario. Titular Archbishop of Sardi (Asia Minor near Smyrna). Papal Nunzio to Portugal. 11-2-67; # 18911-47. “GIMASE.”
*Luigi Sposito. Pontifical Commission for the Archives of the Church in Italy. Head Administrator of the Apostolic Seat of the Vatican.
*Leo Suenens. Cardinal. Title: Protector of the Church of St. Peter in Chains, outside Rome. Promotes Protestant Pentecostalism (Charismatics). Changed much Church dogma when he worked in 3 Sacred Congregations: 1) Propagation of the Faith; 2) Rites and Ceremonies in the Liturgy; 3) Seminaries. 6-15-67; # 21-64. “LESU.”
*Dino Trabalzini. Bishop of Rieti (Reate, Peruga, Italy). Auxiliary Bishop of Southern Rome. 2-6-65; # 61-956. “TRADI.”
*Antonio Travia. Titular Archbishop of Termini Imerese. Head of Catholic schools. 9-15-67; # 16-141. “ATRA.”
*Vittorio Trocchi. Secretary for Catholic Laity in Consistory of the Vatican State Consultations. 7-12-62; # 3-896. “TROVI.”
*Roberto Tucci. Director General of Vatican Radio. 6-21-57; # 42-58. “TURO.”
*David Turoldo. 6-9-67; # 191-44. “DATU.”
*Georgio Vale. Priest. Official of Rome Diocese. 2-21-71; # 21-328. “VAGI.”
*Piero Vergari. Head Protocol Officer of the Vatican Office Segnatura. 12-14-70; # 3241-6. “PIVE.”
*Jean Villot. Cardinal. Secretary of State during Pope Paul VI. He is Camerlengo (Treasurer). “JEANNI,” “ZURIGO.”
*Lino Zanini. Titular Archbishop of Adrianopoli, which is Andrianopolis, Turkey. Apostolic Nuncio. Member of the Revered Fabric of St. Peter’s Basilica.




A Dream that we hope will one day become a reality. But first, we must get all of our investigative
ducks in a row. As more and more of the truth is known, we will not hesitate to let the world, even Times Square, know about it!

For a religious person, it is a crime of the centuries, for those following the Vatican it is a dark question, for those with eyes to see and a mind to think, it is a mystery like no other.

The story of the three children of Fatima who saw the Virgin Mary in 1917 is well known to the world. The leader of that little group of Portuguese peasant shepherds, Lucia dos Santos, the one who not only saw, but heard, and spoke to the Virgin, the one who asked for a miracle and the Miracle of the Sun, seen by 70,000 people, was granted her, is the subject of one of the greatest and, yet, still, unsolved crimes of modern times. A crime that has been identified by a few and is, as yet, unknown to the world at large. A crime of such magnitude that the entire enterprise of renovation and change, initiated from the highest levels of the Vatican since 1958, would be threatened and exposed. What is the crime and who was the victim and the imposter? Which forces in the world could bring such a crime and deception about? That story is the one which a new movie for the world must bring to light. It is a story hidden, yet, in plain sight.

Lucia of Fatima
In 1920, when Jacinta, the youngest of the seers of Fatima, was dying of the Spanish flu, she spoke, on her death bed, of a grave danger that threatened her older cousin Lucia. These dying words of Jacinta, were taken seriously by the parish priest of Fatima, and Lucia was soon taken out of Fatima and placed at a school in Lisbon, where she was given a false identity and told not to speak about the Apparitions at Fatima. The attempt to conceal her identify did not succeed, the Masonic government was on to them and instead, she joined the Dorothean Order of nuns in Spain to serve the Lord in peace and contemplation. The chaos and violence of the Spanish Civil War that threatened the existence of her Order was not as dangerous to her as what was to come. Were the dangers that threatened her related to the Three Secrets that had been entrusted to her by the Virgin Mary? Did it have something to do with the appearance to her of the Virgin in 1929 asking for the pope to consecrate Russia to Her Immaculate Heart? What is clear is that Sister Lucy was an ongoing threat to someone.

The Carmel and the Interview of 1957
After visiting Fatima in 1946, for the first time since she left as a child, Lucia vowed to enter the Carmelite Order of Contemplatives in order to dedicate her life to participating in the Sufferings of Jesus Christ. When she entered her newly assigned cell at the Carmel in Coimbra, Portugal in 1948, she noted the empty wooden cross that occupied the main wall of her room. When she asked why the cross was empty, the mother prioress said that it was because a Carmelite nun must crucify herself with Christ in her life of seclusion and penance. The happiness of her taking of the veil at the Carmel was but the antechamber to great apocalyptic visions and messages given to her by Jesus and Mary during the 1950s, as the whole world waited in expectation for the promised Vatican revelation of the Third Secret of Fatima in 1960. In her meeting with Fr. Fuentes, who was advancing the cause for beatification of her cousins Francisco and Jacinta, she spoke of a “final battle” between the Virgin and the Devil for the souls of men. This is the last time, whether in picture or writing, anyone can scientifically verify the existence of the real Sister Lucy of Fatima (Sister Lucy I).

In fact, in July of 1959, the diocese of Coimbra, Portugal put out a notice which said that, “Sister Lucy has no more to say about Fatima.” Really?

Disappearance (Murder) and Substitution
What happened to Sister Lucy of Fatima, next was unprecedented and still evades the attention of the world. After the explicit rejection by the Vatican of any revelation of the long-awaited Third Secret, the “Sister Lucy” who emerged on to the stage with a pope for a New Age, the revolutionary who would lead the Catholic Church into the “modern age,” was a woman much different from the one that had spoken of the imminent punishment of mankind in her interview in 1957. The woman who emerged onto the balcony with Paul VI was not the demure and withdrawn Visionary, but rather, a woman, much younger looking than the Sister Lucy born in 1907, a woman who looked about 30 years of age rather than 60 years of age as the real Sister Lucy would be. This “Sister Lucy,” the imposter, would be a woman who loved the crowds and even raised Paul VI hand in triumph as they appeared together before a crowd of hundreds of thousands who came together to commemorate the 50th Anniversary of the Apparitions of Fatima on May 13, 1967. Who was this woman? Why were many of the pictures of this event doctored? Why did the woman who presented herself as “Sister Lucy of Fatima” differ in so many fundamental ways from the woman known to the world? What was happening? This was a question that very few asked at the time.

The assassination attempt on John Paul II and the New Sister Lucy
It was only with the assassination attempt on John Paul II by Ali Agca of the Turkish Gray Wolves, that the topic of Fatima and the substitute Sister Lucy, reemerged onto the world stage. Shot on May 13, 1981, the date of the anniversary of the first apparition at Fatima, and, also, while he was bending down to notice the picture of Our Lady of Fatima pinned to a young girl’s dress, it was time, during the next year, to bring out Sister Lucy II. The meeting between the two happened at Fatima in 1982 and it was the beginning of a 23 year connection between the very modern pope and the very modern Sister Lucy. This relationship reached its pinnacle with the announcement, in May 2000, that the Third Secret would be released by the Vatican. To this news, the enthusiastic new Sister Lucy gave her hardy endorsement.

Sister Lucy Truth: The Fraud of the Centuries Uncovered
In 2017, a little known academic, Dr. Peter Chojnowski, after spending several years puzzling over the dissimilarity between photos of the early Sister Lucy and the Sister Lucy of 1967 and beyond, founded Sister Lucy Truth, an organization dedicated to a complete identification of Sister Lucy of Fatima. This project is a scientific attempt to determine whether there was a substitute who replaced a murdered or “disappeared” Sister Lucy of Fatima. After over 2 years of submitting all of the relevant photographic, video, and handwriting evidence to experts at the top of their professions, the conclusion has been a decisive one: SISTER LUCY II (1967-2005) IS AN IMPOSTER. The religious fraud of the centuries is now glaring in the face of an unknowing world. The facts point to one conclusion:

Sister Lucy of Fatima, the Seer of the Virgin, was eliminated after 1958 and another woman was put in her place to act from then on as “Sister Lucy of Fatima.” Who were the dark forces that brought this crime about? Who will investigate what happened to the real Sister Lucy? Who was this woman who was put in her place? What were the intrigues in Church and State which required that Sister Lucy dos Santos, the Sole Surviving Seer of the Apparitions of Fatima, DISAPPEAR FOREVER AND BE REPLACED BY ONE WHO WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE AGENDA OF THE HIGHEST OFFICIALS IN THE VATICAN.

This calls for a movie to break the story to a world that will soon, in the cinema, hear about the Story of Fatima again. It is, however, a story more fascinating and terrifying than anyone could ever have guessed.

For details of the scientific investigation of Sister Lucy of Fatima, see



Montini exposed as Bridge between the Communists and
Vatican during the 40s and early 50s.
September 14th, 2020​


Last edited:


Substitution of Sister Lucy for an Imposter was Clearly a State Secret of the Highest, and only the Highest, Levels of the Vatican. Cardinal Ottaviani seems to have had No Knowledge of it when he sent Fr. Luigi Villa there in 1973.
- September 26, 2020


Must be the reason why Cardinal Ciappi said that the Third Secret was about, "the apostasy in the Church will begin at the VERY TOP." Obviously one or two steps down did not have "clearance" to know about the Fatima Fraud. See link to Chiesa Viva article below.
Among the sensitive issues assigned to him by Card. Ottaviani, was a meeting with Lucia of Fatima. One day Cardinal Ottaviani told Fr. Villa: «I think I will send you to Fatima to speak directly with Sister Lucia.»

He accepted with joy. A business man from Padua joined him, Mr. Pagnossin, a convert of Padre Pio, who offered to pay for the trip and the stay in Portugal. Cardinal Ottaviani had provided him with a personal letter, signed by him, as Prefect of the Holy Office. This was to be delivered to the Bishop of Coimbra, to allow him to arrange a meeting with Sister Lucia. But the Bishop of Coimbra, before granting the meeting with the Seer, picked up the phone and called the Vatican. Msgr. Giovanni Benelli answered but, before giving the permission, he told him that he wanted to talk to Paul VI, because Rome had given strict orders: “an interview” with Lucy was allowed only to Royalty and to Cardinals.

Msgr. Benelli, Pro-secretary of State, transmitted to the Bishop of Coimbra the prohibition of Paul VI for the request of an interview with Sister Lucia. Useless, then, was the insistence of Father Villa, in high- lighting his role as the envoy of the Prefect of the Holy Office. However, he remained in Portugal, trying to overcome the resistance of the Bish- op. After ten days, however, he had to resign himself to defeat. He only ob- tained permission from the Bishop to celebrate a Mass in the Chapel of the Convent.

When back in Italy, Father Luigi went immediately to report the incident to Card. Ottaviani. The Cardinal felt offended by the conduct of Paul VI, and immediately wrote a letter of protest. After returning later, in Rome, Cardinal Ottaviani told Father Villa that Paul VI had made an apology, saying, however, that Msgr. Benelli had made the decision. But the Cardinal pointed out that this was the usual method of the double-dealing of Paul VI.

As long as Pius XII lived, the Vatican, for Father Villa, was more than welcoming: in addition to meetings, related to his activities as a secret agent, Father Villa dined and supped at least fifty times with Cardinals and Bishops. But when Paul VI came to power, he found himself deprived of every hospitality and every opportunity to take steps to defend the Catholic Faith.



With a Slight of Hand, Cardinal Ratzinger (2000) Affirms that the "Third Secret," released by the Vatican, is both "authentic" and "complete." Our Experts said, "Yes" to the First, but even Common Sense says "No" to the Second.

- October 04, 2020


For our expert's analysis of the text released by the Vatican as the "Third Secret," see,

Dr. Chojnowski: "The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith made available to the press THE FULL TEXT of the so-called third secret of Fatima, at a press conference on June 26, which the text in Sister Lucia's handwriting is reproduced in facsimile, so there can be no further reasonable discussion as to the authenticity and the completeness of the text [as if these are the same thing; they are not. Without the real Sister Lucy's testimony, how would we know that the text is "complete"?]. In this booklet, not only the sequence of visions but also the series of pieces written about them by Sister Lucia [hence the importance of the investigation into the identity of Sister Lucy and her apparent disappearance.]....Furthermore, the address you referred to by Cardinal Sodano is reproduced and I personally have provided an attempt at interpretation of the text [Question: Why not just ask "Sister Lucy" what it means?]....[Then follows the by now well known account of the "bishop in white" and what the Cardinal admits is a "killing" of the pope.] [However] the story does not unfold with an inescapable determinism [because JPII was not obviously killed, like he should have been if he had been the "bishop in white."], as if everything were in any case already unalterably written, but remains a story of freedom: repentance can change the vision [so why then hold it back for 40 years?] The whole secret is a dramatic call to the freedom of men."Dr. Chojnowski: I thought it was a call to recognize the awesome sovereignty of God? I wonder how much of the script for the fake Sister Lucy in the later years --- especially during her interviews with Carlos Evaristo, were written for her by Ratzinger? She speaks there about the "conversion of Russia" as not at all being a conversion to the Catholic Faith, but a conversion to Liberalism, so that everyone can choose what ever religion they want.




"Vision of Fatima" by Sculptor Fr. Thomas McGlynn, published in 1948, Indicates the real Sister Lucy requested that Pope Pius XII Give an Address to the Portuguese People for the Silver Anniversary of the Fatima Apparition. Author Makes it Clear that the Inclusion of All the Bishops of the World with the Pope in a Consecration of Russia was Publicized to the World by 1947.

- February 20, 2021


Here is the text describing the discussion of Fr. Thomas McGlynn, O.P. to the Patriarch of Lisbon in 1947 in Fr. McGlynn's book, Vision of Fatima (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1948), pp. 29-30.

"The important address of Pope Pius XII to the Portuguese people made in Portuguese on October 31, 1942, in connection with the ceremonies of the Silver Jubilee of the apparitions at Fatima [how different from the ceremony of the Golden Jubilee with Paul VI and the fake "Sister Lucy"] was evidently, His Eminence pointed out, a consequence of Lucy's own request made to the Holy Father, of which the Cardinal had knowledge. Lucy had said that the Blessed Virgin wanted the world consecrated to her Immaculate Heart with special mention to be made of Russia. She had declared the special grace to be granted in reward for this consecration would be the shortening of the war, and that, if the Holy Father wished to see an example of the blessings which this would bring to the world, it could be observed in the case of Portugal [namely, that the Consecration of Portugal to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, by all of the bishops of the country, had kept Portugal OUT of World War II.]"

"The Cardinal, in reply to my [Fr. McGlynn's] inquiry, said that he had not heard of the special manner of consecrating Russia to the Immaculate Heart which had lately been declared [emphasis mine]; namely, that all the Bishops of the world are expected to participate with the Holy Father on a special day in one great act of offering Russia to Our Lady's Immaculate Heart."


Dr. Chojnowski: This was back in 1948. Clearly this particular act NEVER happened. The closest the world ever came to this is when Pope Pius XII himself, consecrated Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in his papal bull Sacro Vergente of July 7, 1952.





This is NOT a text that seeks to "debunk" the Miracle. Quite the contrary, it adds a previously unknown dimension to the Miracle itself. This astrophysicist of 45 years says here that the Miracle was certainly not a case of mass hysteria or mass suggestion.

You can order this text through the Sister Lucy Truth Smile account available on the sidebar of RadTrad Thomist.




Kevin Symonds, the Carmelites of Coimbra, and the Vatican Continue to Present the Woman who is Clearly an Imposter as if She were the Real Sister Lucy. How about we just admit that John XXIII, Paul VI, and JPII were either hoodwinked (not likely) or they were the hoodwinkers? They have begun to fess up about the pedophilia, why not fess up about this tragedy?​


This is the new painting unveiled and "blessed" of "Sister Lucy" by the Carmel of Coimbra in their continued sinister cover-up of the greatest case of identity fraud in the history of the Catholic Church.

Help us unveil the fraud and find out what happened.
  • Like
Reactions: EdY



Ratzinger knows about the substitution of Sister Lucy of Fatima. It is time for him to come clear about this --- the Greatest Cover-Up in the History of the Catholic Church!​


This is the only image I have of the Fake Sister Lucy with Cardinal Ratzinger. He met with her, had a picture taken to portray to the world that this was the real Sister Lucy. He knows that this is a fraud and that his portrayal of the Third Secret was also a complete fraud. Why don't these men ever come clean? Even when facing death and judgment?