Newchurch LFP

Admin

Administrator
A new authoritarianism has descended upon us. It is unacceptable that you add even a private opinion outside of the establishment of private opinions otherwise known as 'the loose federation of priests' (hereinafter called the LFP). They even have a prayer request circulating that if one group of SSPX-MC priests steps outside the politically correct group of SSPX-MC priests under the newchurch LFP, then the former has to be exorcised. As views other than the official ones are unacceptable, what is also unacceptable is that you should be allowed to express them - after all ipso facto - they are the devil's work! How enlightening it is to know that the mantle of infallibility now rests on the shoulders of the uncorrectable 'I have spoken' Bishop Williamson and his acolyte Pax priests.

The new authoritarianism has found a very fertile field in the denigration of a certain seminary which has now reached an hysterical crescendo. Said seminary must be stopped and silenced, not by logic, but by ridicule and abuse....and wait for it.....exorcism! Guilty of the unacceptable sin of loyalty, the targeted institute is now condemned and accused of doing the devil's work! WOW!

Instead we see a man-made organisation (LFP), with no sense of tradition and respect, full of midgets who would sell their souls for a nod of approval from their adored patron, and wailing like a Greek chorus trying to drown out the voice of Archbishop Lefebvre kept alive by his true sons.

No-one seems prepared to say it, but such an attitude is mean, ungenerous and downright dangerous for it separates the flock from the true faith that the seminary keeps alive in all its purity. Worse still, it shows how the new authoritarianism of the LFP establishment is to be obeyed at all costs denying access to any resources other than its own.
 
R

Rose

Guest
They even have a prayer request circulating that if one group of SSPX-MC priests steps outside the politically correct group of SSPX-MC priests under the newchurch LFP, then the former has to be exorcised.

How sad. But at the same time, how revealing of what the thought process is.

Adhere to the party line or else...

Well, those who forget their history are doomed to repeat it. In this case, the followers of Bp. Williamson are being subjected to the same manipulation tactics the communists have utilized. Follow the party line or else...you will be exorcised :)
 

Fleur De Lille

New Member
How sad. But at the same time, how revealing of what the thought process is.

Adhere to the party line or else...

Well, those who forget their history are doomed to repeat it. In this case, the followers of Bp. Williamson are being subjected to the same manipulation tactics the communists have utilized. Follow the party line or else...you will be exorcised :)
Can a loose association have a party line ? Are the two terms not contradicting each other ?
 
R

Rose

Guest
Can a loose association have a party line ? Are the two terms not contradicting each other ?

A federation, however loose, still implies a type of unity of thought and movement. A network if you will...we are seeing how organized and tightly-knit as time goes on...

Federation:[fed-uh-rey-shuh n] noun
1. the act of federating or uniting in a league.
2. the formation of a political unity, with a central government, by a number of separate states, each of which retains control of its own internal affairs.
3. a league or confederacy.
4. a federated body formed by a number of nations, states, societies, unions, etc., each retaining control of its own internal affairs.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/federation?s=t
 

Fleur De Lille

New Member
unity of thought and movement : the Catholic Faith
central government : the Papacy and Church Hierarchy
control of its own internal affairs : a Parish

What's your bone of contention ? And how does it apply to 'them' and not to 'us' ? Or are you just trying to find any stick to hit 'them' with ?
 
D

Deleted member 149

Guest
Can a loose association have a party line ? Are the two terms not contradicting each other ?
BW had many times in his Eleison Comments and conferences referred to his new group thinking as a "federation of priests"; "a loose network of priests"; " a loose association of priests"; which is a structure for sure however "loose" it is. Bishop Faure had implemented this in his seminary in France. It is Bishop Williamson being the one of contradiction and position contrary from ABL within his speech/writing and act. As BW follows in his above directives, he yet says that he "does not want to lead" so to be a headless structure (pure Protestantism); yet, we see sacramental, social, and political punishments coming directly from him as with allowing his people to be against those with "exorcism prayers" who do not "agree" with his compromised and erroneous undertakings.

Letter of Dom [Bishop] Tomas Aquinas to Fr. Cardozo. “Criticizing Bishop Williamson has consequences”.

Here is the rest of their motto and implementation: http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/fake-resistance-watch.3770/#post-6329
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Admin

Administrator
  • Unity of thought : >Vatican II>New Catechism>Counterfeit Church>LFP>unity destroyed : movement>towards individualism : the Catholic Faith : new catechism>ecumenism>one size fits all>conversion no longer required.
  • Central government>replaced by new Authoritarianism : the Papacy: : See of Peter now occupied by material heretic Church Hierarchy : Replaced by democracy
  • Control of its own internal affairs - Parish : Novus Ordo Missae/Indult Mass>protestantism
 
Top