Moran back with OLMC -- did he ever leave?

david

Member
corrected. thank you.

What I can't wrap my head around, is why so many of the priests and "clergy" associated with OLMC of late have curious backgrounds.
Unfortunately so many of the Priests and clergy associated with Rome also have curious backgrounds. The same problem curiously also occurs among different Traditional groups.

We must pray for a return to the faith.

God Bless.
 

lulu

Member
Thank you to Ecclesia Militans for providing further information on Ambrose Moran.

http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/2018/08/25/a-second-inquiry-into-the-alleged-episcopal-consecration-of-ambrose-moran-by-cardinal-slipyj/

A Second Inquiry into the Alleged Episcopal Consecration of Ambrose Moran by Cardinal Slipyj
Aug 25, 2018

In this post, I presented an e-mail from Don Marco Yaroslav Semehen, the then and still Rector of St. Sophia church in Rome, in which he concluded that the episcopal consecration certificate presented by Ambrose Moran as evidence of his episcopal consecration by Cardinal Slipyj is false. St. Sophia is the church where Ambrose Moran claims he was consecrated a bishop by Cardinal Slipyj. With Ambrose Moran now back in the picture at the Our Lady of Mount Carmel seminary in Boston, Kentucky, I decided to make a second inquiry at the same church. I presented the above linked episcopal consecration certificate as well as this picture (background is St. Sophia church) and website. This morning (of August 25, 2018) I received the following (in red font) via e-mail from Don Andriy Soletskyy, current Vice Rector of St. Sophia church in Rome:

Glory to Jesus Christ!

Let me give you a brief response on your request, concerning the presence in the Historical Archives of the UGCC in Rome of the documents testifying the possible Bishop ordination of William (Vasyliy, Amvrosiy) Moran by Patriarch Josyph.

Checking the main archival funds and cases revealed the complete absence of such documents. Moreover, the comparison of signatures of His Beatitude Josyph and His Excellency Isydor Boretskyy from that period with the signatures in the “document” sent by you, certifies that your document is a falsification and the signatures in it are fake.

We have found instead a letter from Bishop Boretskyy to Patriarch Josyph, containing a petition for acceptance under his jurisdiction of Bishop of the Ukrainian Orthodox Autocephalous Church in America Mykolay Ilnytskyy with two priests, Ivan Ropke and William Moran, from November 29, 1974. In a draft of the response letter Patriarch Josyph asks Boretskyy to send the original documents and to find out more about the canonical status of the requesters.

Any other documents were not found. In my opinion, there is no need of further researches, which may take a long time. Also, from the newly opened Archival funds of SBU (Security Service of Ukraine) we know that similar fake documents were often made by Soviet secret service.

A second investigation, conducted by a different priest, produces the same result, that is, Ambrose Moran is a fraud by presenting himself as a Catholic bishop consecrated by Cardinal Slipyj. Yet he has managed somehow to gain the Kentucky Fathers’ trust.

The following is a screenshot taken on August 25, 2018 of the website linked above, which provides information regarding St. Sophia church in Rome (taken in case it changes in the future):



 

MaryM

Well-Known Member
Thank you, EM.

Ambrose Moran and the Genuine Orthodox Church of America

http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/2018/08/27/ambrose-moran-and-the-genuine-orthodox-church-of-america/

In the latter part of 2007, Ambrose Moran joined a schismatic sect called the Genuine Orthodox Church of America (GOCA). The major event he took part in was the “consecration” of “Bishop” John. In mid-2008, Ambrose Moran left the GOCA. You can read the timeline of events here as told by the GOCA. It was from “Bishop” Gregory that I obtained Ambrose Moran’s Orthodox consecration certificate. Ambrose Moran presented it as evidence that he was an Orthodox bishop. He also presented this letter.

When asked about this time in his life, Ambrose Moran told the Kentucky Fathers that “Bishop” Gregory led him to believe that he wished to be received into the Catholic Church. Now if one reads the GOCA website and clicks on the link below, which is to an impartial news post published in July 2008, he may be forced to ask himself, “Can anything be more comical than Ambrose Moran’s claim that ‘Bishop’ Gregory wanted to become Catholic?”
 

BoPeep

Member
Ambrose Moran and the Eparchy of Toronto
Sep 1, 2018

In late 2015, Fr. Juan Ortiz sent several documents to Fr. Fr. Bohdan Bilinksy, the then and current Episcopal Vicar of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Toronto and Eastern Canada, for review and analysis. Fr. Bilinsky sent Fr. Ortiz this letter in response. Of particular interest for this post is this 1976 letter, which is also found on this website, allegedly written by Bishop Isidore Borecky, the then Eparch of Toronto. Ambrose Moran presented this letter to Fr. Pfeiffer as additional evidence that he was consecrated a bishop by Cardinal Slipyj. Furthermore, this letter states that Cardinal Slipyj was to announce that Ambrose Moran would be appointed his successor as Metropolitan Archbishop. Ambrose Moran never did become Metropolitan Archbishop after Cardinal Slipyj’s death in 1984. Instead, it was Cardinal Myroslav Ivan Lubachivsky, who was co-consecrated a bishop by Cardinal Slipyj in 1979, that became his successor. Well, then, why wasn’t Ambrose Moran appointed the successor as per the letter? For the answer, let us read the words of Fr. Bilinsky:

“A copy of this letter is not in our files. The signature on this document is not congruent with other signatures of Bishop Isidore’s that we have on file. I allege that it is a forgery.”

Fr. Bilinsky is spot on regarding the letter being a forgery. First, note that the letter does not contain a protocol number, which is typical in official Church correspondence. Compare it to this letter (also found on this website), which is in the Eparchy of Toronto archives, as attested to by Fr. Bilinsky himself. The letter found in the archives contains Protocol No. 2/75c. Second, let us recall in this post that Ambrose Moran wrote a letter in 1980 to Bishop Isidore Borecky, which Fr. Bilinsky also attests to being in the Eparchy of Toronto archives, addressing himself as “Father” Moran, referencing Protocol No. 2/75c, and requesting a letter of reference to be admitted to the Orthodox Church in America. These all show that the 1976 letter is a fake. As a side note, the 1980 letter is NOT posted on this website. Hmm. I wonder why.

So let us see now. Ambrose Moran fakes an episcopal consecration certificate, fakes a photo of himself with Cardinal Slipy, and fakes a letter in which he has Bishop Isidore Borecky state that he was consecrated a bishop by and appointed successor to Cardinal Slipyj. What should be one’s response toward Ambrose Moran in this situation? Run far away!

Screenshots of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Toronto and Eastern Canada website:









Screenshots of the Catholic Hierarchy website:






 
Last edited by a moderator:

Admin

Administrator
http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/201...ewko-and-fr-pfeiffer-regarding-ambrose-moran/

Father Hugo Ruiz V. requested that the following unanswered letter be made public.

August 28th 2018

Dear Father Hewko,

I am sending this letter to you but I would like you to communicate it, please, also to Father Pfeiffer.

Since I met you with Father Pfeiffer, I have always had in very good concept your people and your apostolate. I note that you have reacted correctly to the FSSPX crisis and that, with great zeal, you have helped many of the faithful abandoned by the neo-FSSPX in the four corners of the United States, and elsewhere. Likewise, your firmness to avoid any doctrinal decline in what today is called “resistance” which would simply be the authentic continuation of the work of Monsignor Lefebvre and the Church.

It is true that times are difficult and that we do not know how much longer this terrible crisis can last, not only for the Church but also for society and the world. But it is also true that in this expectation we must always refer to Divine Providence since God can do everything and he watches over us, we must always believe that, at a given moment, God will come to our aid, because he cannot abandon his indefinitely, it is impossible. However, He puts us to the test for a time, and that is why we must know how to wait and not rush into trying to force a given situation.

The fact that you do not yet find a bishop to ordain your seminarians does not mean that you would never find him. If we have to wait, we must wait, but we should not force the situation and resort to a “bishop” who is, at best, doubtful. It was sufficiently proved that “Bishop” Ambrose Moran was not ordained by Cardinal Slipyj and that even after the alleged ordination he continued his activities in the schismatic Orthodox church. The solution to your problems is not there, it is obviously not God’s will. By this decision you can break the trust of the faithful that have recourse to your apostolate and to whom you have so far done so much good. I ask you fraternally, as a priest whom you esteem, to distance yourself definitively from this man who is not clear in anything about what he does, all this is a false solution, an illusion. Henceforth, it is necessary to make a public retraction because the ordination “under condition” of Father Poisson is a very serious matter, you must dissociate yourself publicly and definitively from Ambroise Moran, because by this error, even your Catholic orthodoxy is compromised. If you do not go back and make reparation for this mistake I personally would be obliged, to my regret, to move away from you and your apostolate, for it is a matter of first order.

You can count with my fraternal prayers and support in all that is good.

May the Immaculate Virgin enlighten and guide you,

Father Hugo Ruiz V.

Father Ruiz

..
 

Admin

Administrator
Ambrose has already celebrated Mass at OLMC church to the congregation there. He gave a sermon introducing himself. I remember listening to it.

..
 

MaryM

Well-Known Member
The Kentucky Fathers have in effect reversed their public statement of November 7, 2015 in which they declared that they would not associate with Ambrose Moran.


Fr. Hewko, Mrs. Blaszak, Br. Dominic, Mateo Richards at Richards home 2017

Fr. Hewko, seminarians, and brothers at Richards home doing chores 2017

Fr. Hewko and boys' trip boys at Richards 2017

Moran's stuff in garage of Richard's lake house (where he has been living for a few years) 2017


Moran in kitchen of Richard's home, 2017
Fr. Pfeiffer at Richards house:


Moran is living in Richards lake house, 5 miles from their family home.
 

MaryM

Well-Known Member
http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/2018/10/07/the-problem-with-ambrose-moran/


The Problem with Ambrose Moran


You may download here a paper containing 23 points of concern regarding Ambrose Moran compiled by the Quebec Resistance and distributed October 7, 2018. These points were presented to Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer and Fr. David Hewko on August 2, 2018, except points 21, 22, and 23, which were presented to the Fathers today.


---------------

http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/2018_10_07_THE_PROBLEM_WITH_AMBROSE_MORAN_Quebec_Resistance.pdf


THE PROBLEM WITH AMBROSE MORAN

1) Baptized in Orthodox Church: In a letter to Archbishop Gregory, Moran says he was born and baptized an Orthodox

2) No Catholic baptismal certificate shown up to now: all we know is that Moran was baptized into the schismatic Ukrainian Orthodox Church in 1953.

3) Only a certificate that he was ordained in the Orthodox Church: Ambrose Moran tells us in a video, at 4 minutes & 50 seconds, that he was ordained a priest by Cardinal Josyf Slipyj in 1974, but there is no certificate of this .The May 1974 Ordination Certificate is the ordination (Orthodox)
certificate found in the archives of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Toronto and Eastern Canada. Here are the comments of Fr. Bohdan Bilinksy, current Episcopal Vicar of the same Eparchy, regarding this certificate.

“The letterhead is from the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church of Kiev. The signatory, Bishop Nicholas is that of an Orthodox Bishop and not connected with the Catholic (Roman nor Eastern) Church hierarchy.”

This certificate of ordination in the Orthodox Church was confirmed authentic by a high-ranking schismatic clergyman of the Holy Protection Cathedral. This clergyman telephoned Ambrose Moran, asked him questions, and was satisfied with his answers.

4) Archbishop Nicholas wasn’t even a Bishop when Moran was supposedly ordained by him: Bishop Nicholas was consecrated a Bishop in 1978 and so he couldn’t have ordained Ambrose in 1974.

5) Major inconsistencies with the 1976 Certificate of Consecration(Catholic):

- the Certificate of Consecration has been cut off at the bottom, including the ‘seal’ on the left and the seal of Bp. Borecky is missing, which makes the document not legal.

- There is no day for the date, but only “July____1976”

- Card. Slipyj is using a title of “Patriarch” which was never granted by Rome; he had only the title of “Major Archbishop”

-The so-called “Bp. Dimitri” signing on behalf of “Patriarch Maximos V” (1908-2001, a Mekite Greek Catholic Patriarch), does not exist; this name never appears in any list of bishops of the Melkite Patriarchate; it would also make no sense to sign “on behalf” of another bishop in a Consecration Certificate.

- The name of the Church “St. Clement” in Rome has been crossed out and replaced by handwriting with “St. Sophia.”

- The letterhead and the frame is not in use by the Catholic Ukrainians but by the Orthodox Ukrainians. The mention of “Our Vicar Bishop” has no sense in the ecclesiastical vocabulary, except for the Vicar of Rome, who represents the Pope; the appropriate expressions would be ‘Auxiliary’ of ‘Coadjutor,’ but it is always mentioned in a separate document

-We have no Catholic record of any separate document attesting that Moran has previously received the title of “Archimandrite.”

-The name of William/Ambrose Moran never appears in any list of Bishops consecrated by Card. Slipyj in the website catholic-hierarchy.org.

- Fr. Marco Yaroslav Semethen, the Parish Priest of the Ukrainian Catholic Santa Sofia Basilica in Rome where Moran claims he was consecrated by Slipyj in 1976, after examining the “Episcopal Certificate’ provided by Moran, arrived at the following conclusions:

“Document absolutely false! I ran the document for verification to close associates of Cardinal Slipyy of that period. And those of Mons. Ivan Muzycka and Mons. Ivan Dacko was negative! In archives took Basilica Santa Sofia is not no copy of the document dubbed. Signed by Cardinal Slipyi the document submitted does not match with the real signature he used His Beatitude! The same signature and letterhead. Stamp also false! Signature of bishop Boretsky not match the signature he used! Two witnesses who were secretaries of cardinelw Slipyi not remember a fact of Episcopal Moran Dolgoroukyi. It’s all.”

- In addition, here are the comments of Fr. Bohdan Bilinksy (of the Ukranian Catholic Eparchy of Toronto) regarding this certificate:

“The signatures of Cardinal Slipyj and Bishop Borecky are not congruent with their signatures we have on file. I allege that they are forgeries. The signature of Bishop Dmitri is not familiar to me but Bishop Dmitri was not likely to sign for another.”

6) Problems with the 1976 Certificate of Consecration (Orthodox):

- The Episcopal Certificate has been altered by handwriting in two places: the date of Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Orders, including episcopal consecration, has been changed from Sunday June 12, 1983 to Sunday June 12, 1953; and the date of the ceremony was changed from 1983 to 1976. A closer look at the document allows us to see that in both cases the original dates were 1983 and 1984 respectfully. A proof of the alteration is that “June 12, 1953” was not a Sunday but a Friday!

- In addition, the date of this ceremony of consecration cannot be “June 12, 1953” because Moran was three years old! Actually it is easy to conclude that the real date of his episcopal consecration was rather on “Sunday, June 12, 1983”.

- In addition, Moran claims that the bishops who consecrated him a bishop were “Catholic” at the time of the consecration. This is totally untrue. We have testimonies affirming they were Schismatic Orthodox.

7) The certificate stationary is always the same: The certificate stationery is the same from 1974 to 1986 from Catholic to Orthodox from New York to Rome from priest ordination to Bishop consecration. Bishop Kirkland's Orthodox certificate in 1986 and Moran's ordination and his Cardinal Slipyj consecration certificate in 1976 are all printed from the same source. Note that the twelfth star down on the right hand border on all the documents have the same stamp imperfection.

8) No letter of incardination: From a reply from the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Toronto: “HE WAS NOT incardinated into the Eparchy of Toronto and Eastern Canada.” Fr. Andriy Chirovsky: “I do, hereby, declare that (Priest, Bishop, Archbishop) Moran IS NOT and NEVER HAS BEEN incardinated into the
Eparchy of Toronto and Eastern Canada.”

9) Letter from Bishop Isidore to Ambrose is suspect:

a) From a reply from the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Toronto: “Another letter allegedly from Bishop Isidore to Ambrose. Is suspect. It has no protocol number. It is dated Aug. 26, 1976.”

b) In the supposed letter from Bishop Isidore Borecky confirming Ambrose's appointment as Metropolitan-Archbishop, August 26, 1976, the signature appears copied from Moran’s Letter of Incardination.

10) Doctored photos:

a) Photo of Ambrose Moran and Cardinal Slipyj outside Holy Wisdom (St. Sophia) Cathedral, Rome, in 1976, following ceremony of episcopal consecration.

b) Photo of John Paul II and Ambrose Moran.

11) Doesn’t sign as a Bishop in June 30, 1980 letter: This is a letter found in the archives of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Toronto and Eastern Canada. William Moran identifies himself as “Fr.” Basil Moran. Hold on a minute! Why does he identify himself as “Father” when he was supposedly consecrated a bishop twice in 1976 (and this while he was continuing his graduate studies as per the February 14, 1975 letter, which is also referenced in this June 30, 1980 letter)? And don’t forget that Bishop Borecky himself, according to Ambrose Moran, co-consecrated him a bishop in July 1976 and provided him a letter dated August 26, 1976 congratulating him for being appointed the successor of Cardinal Josyf Slipyj.

12) Says he submitted himself to the Orthodox Church: In a letter that was received by Bishop Isidore Borecky and dated June 30, 1980, “Fr.” Moran says:

“I am writing to inform Your Grace that I have submitted to the jurisdiction of Metropolitan Archbishop Theodosius of the Orthodox Church in America in order to regularize myself finally. I want to express my sincere thanks to you for all your help and kindness in past years.

“As I am in the process of being received into the Orthodox Church in America, a short note from Your Grace would be very helpful….stating that I am of good character….”

13) Doesn’t dress as a Bishop: In 1982 at a Chrism Mass with Bishop Musey, Moran was already a bishop at that point for 6 years. Never does a bishop dress as a simple priest for a Chrism Mass.

14) Schismatic in 1983: There is a decree appointing Bishop Ambrose Moran to be the successor of Metropolitan Hryhorij (Gregory), presiding consecrating bishop of Ambrose Moran in 1976, and Metropolitan Andrew for the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church in the U.S.A. The decree was signed by four schismatic bishops, including Ambrose Moran, and dated December 15, 1983. This document shows that Bishop Ambrose Moran was still a schismatic in 1983, seven years after his consecration by the schismatic Metropolitan Hryhorij (Gregory). Cardinal Josyf Slipyj died on September 7, 1984. If Cardinal Slipyj truly consecrated or re-consecrated Ambrose Moran in 1976, then why was Ambrose Moran under the wing of Metropolitan Hryhorij (Gregory) in 1983 while Cardinal Slipyj was still alive? You would think he would have been under the wing of Cardinal Slipyj (or someone else appointed by Rome), if Ambrose Moran remained Catholic from 1976 after his alleged consecration by Cardinal Slipyj to the Cardinal’s death in 1984.

15) Affiliation with Genuine Orthodox Church of America (G.O.C.A.) as late as October 2007: Proof of this is:

a) letter by Moran to Archbishop Gregory giving his Orthodox resume

b) letter of Moran to the clergy and faithful of the G.O.C.A. announcing that he was joining this church.

c) a letter by Gregory to Moran welcoming him to the G.O.C.A.

d) a declaration read and signed by Moran during his Reception into the G.O.C.A.

16) Website says he was a Metropolitan-Archbishop in the schismatic church in 2010: On the website page, there is mention of a Dimtri Gaines serving under Metropolitan-Archbishop Ambrose Moran in the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church in the USA until 2010.

17) False doctrine: In an interview with Fr. Hewko, at 16: 38, Ambrose says: “When I look at the fruit that comes from Vatican II for whatever reason – misinterpretation or certain individuals going off in a different direction – I find in general a very upsetting situation in what is called the Catholic Church since Vatican II.” Vatican II itself is bad, not just the fruit from it and Fr. Hewko corrects Ambrose on this point during the same interview.

18) Dubious statement about Archbishop Lefebvre: Ambrose claims to have offered Archbishop Lefebvre to help with co-consecrating the bishops in 1988. Archbishop Lefebvre apparently told him that he already had a co-consecrator and that Ambrose was to work quietly in the wings.

19) Negative accounts: The replies from priests and bishops about Ambrose have been firmly in the negative. (see replies from the former rector of the Maronite Cathedral Our Lady of Lebanon, the Provincial Secretary of the Salesians regarding Don Bosco College Seminary, the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Toronto, etc.)

20) Official pictures from Incarnation School, Queens Village, N.Y: The photos in the official yearbook show him as a “religious brother” in 1972 and as a layman 1973.


21) Ambrose claims to be a Cardinal. A person who met and spoke with Ambrose Moran in Boston, Kentucky back in September 2015, recounted the following: “Ambrose told us that JPII secretly made him a cardinal by an esoteric symbolic gesture known to Church insiders. He said that during his audience with JPII, not only did JPII refer to him as "Josephat the New," but also that JPII removed Ambrose's skullcap and put it back on Ambrose's head inside out. Ambrose told us that this was a covert way to communicate JPII's election of Ambrose to the cardinalate. Ambrose gave us a series of titles we could call him. I can remember Archbishop, Archimandrite, Metropolitan, and Patriarch. He told me the proper way to address him is "Your Beatitude."

22) Ambrose claims to be the “bishop in white” The same person who met and spoke with Moran in Boston, Kentucky back in September 2105 (see point #21 above) also stated the following: ”One of the claims he made at the restaurant is that he believes he might be the bishop in white referred to by Sister Lucia in the vision of the Third Secret of Fatima. He told us that, because of his ecclesiastical rank, he is permitted to wear a white cassock. And because of the great work of saving the Church that he is now come out from hiding to perform, he will most likely be killed . . .”

23) Gives non-Catholic advice: Back in September 2015, in Boston Kentucky, Ambrose Moran gave advice to a young Catholic girl visiting OLMC. She was trying to decide whether to join the religious life or get married and Ambrose suggested to her that she could marry an Orthodox priest in order to have “the best of the both worlds.”

To view any ceritficates, letters, etc., you can contact : christusrexquebec@bell.net
 

MaryM

Well-Known Member
Archbishop Lefevbre:

"In these critical moments, we must remain with that which is surest. We must avoid doubtful things.


We must make our stand on things that are certain, absolutely certain, without a thousandth per cent of doubt [...]"
 

Admin

Administrator
Archbishop Lefevbre:

"In these critical moments, we must remain with that which is surest. We must avoid doubtful things.


We must make our stand on things that are certain, absolutely certain, without a thousandth per cent of doubt [...]"
To act in such a way that awaits a personal revelation from Our Lady to show us clearly what to do at present about Ambrose amounts to a proclamation that we are left orphaned by God. The fact is that Ambrose has already been accepted as a Catholic Bishop in his

  • having already said a public Mass with the approval of Frs. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko
  • conditional re-ordination of Fr. Poisson with the approval of Frs. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko
  • all backed up by documented proof that at the very least requires equally scholarly proof to be erroneous.
..
 

MaryM

Well-Known Member
To act in such a way that awaits a personal revelation from Our Lady to show us clearly what to do at present about Ambrose amounts to a proclamation that we are left orphaned by God. The fact is that Ambrose has already been accepted as a Catholic Bishop in his

  • having already said a public Mass with the approval of Frs. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko
  • conditional re-ordination of Fr. Poisson with the approval of Frs. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko
  • all backed up by documented proof that at the very least requires equally scholarly proof to be erroneous.
..
Fr. Hewko accepts Moran by his actions, regardless of the words that come out of his mouth; that is, allowing Moran and fr. Poisson to say mass for the Faithful.
 
Last edited:

Admin

Administrator
How can the Fathers be waiting for Our Lady to make things clear when they have already precluded Her answer by publicly accepting Ambrose as a Catholic Bishop?

..
 

Ecclesia Militans

Well-Known Member
How can the Fathers be waiting for Our Lady to make things clear when they have already precluded Her answer by publicly accepting Ambrose as a Catholic Bishop?

..
They are asking Our Lady over and over again when She already gave Her answer a while ago. Her answer is, "No!"
 

Admin

Administrator
It is more serious than that. In his latest video Fr. Hewko has said he is waiting for Our Lady to make things clear when he has made up his mind already. The Fathers are giving a bad example to the flock by publicly accepting that Ambrose is a Catholic Bishop. It is an insult to Our Lady to say they are waiting for her answer when they are doing nothing of the sort.

..
 

MaryM

Well-Known Member
It is more serious than that. In his latest video Fr. Hewko has said he is waiting for Our Lady to make things clear when he has made up his mind already. The Fathers are giving a bad example to the flock by publicly accepting that Ambrose is a Catholic Bishop. It is an insult to Our Lady to say they are waiting for her answer when they are doing nothing of the sort.

..
The end justifies the means.

OLMC is not of God.
 
Last edited:
Top