French District Superior attacks the Dominicans of Avrillé

  • Thread starter Deleted member 149
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 149

Guest
Father Christian Bouchacourt, the French District Superior, wrote a scathing article today warning against the Traditional faith and support of the Dominicans of Avrillé and the Catholic resistance at large. Not surprising since there is a doctrinal civil war and rupture within the neo-sspx that the superiors and General House are trying desperately to cover up; including Bishop Fellay's recent interview expressing a "Bp. Fellay's new interview: update on the sspx" that is happening within the walls of his neo-sspx.

When the walls of Jericho were shaking, the people inside did not portray a different story than that trouble is eminent from their transgressions against God. What is it that the people in Menzingen are not comprehending?

Certainly we would like to know from these neo-sspx superiors what is the substance of discord and accusations so we may be enlightened in our catechism to discern these [bad] Dominicans of Avrillé. However, Fr. Bouchacourt, like his confers Fr. Pfluger, Fr. Rostand, Fr. Couture, and Bishop Fellay, find themselves justified not to include that information.

Yes, their position as superiors only want to remind us to be "obedient" to them with blind trust in what they say so to stay away from those Catholic Resistance troublemakers and dissidents of a different faith.

Restructuring a crisis to get out of a bind is an option that follows us in original sin; but it is not a good option to choose.

Fr. Bouchacourt chose to direct an ad hominem of "no evidence" from the Dominicans when in fact the Dominicans (and the Catholic Resistance) has evidence based websites that is thorough in expounding; which as Dominicans, they always do.

For the neo-sspx superiors, they see the grass on the other side of the fence is a greener pasture for them with a "peaceful future"; so you Catholic resistance people, do not upset the cart to missionize us with apologetics to change our minds.

Entrenchment in Jericho is a life suited to make new friends, even though they are different and the walls are shaking; we will fix it from the inside they tell us. With what, hot glue and pretzels.

In talking to these neo-sspxers, one must unplug your brain to understand them.

Like the young Fr. Themann who received a promotion to be rector of the Australian Seminary, and "Bloopers" goes to Menzingen. to be the Communications Director in Menzingen, Fr. Bouchacourt didn't earn his promotion to the most prominent French District for nothing in serving the personal needs of Bishop Fellay.

---------------------------------------------

About Dominicans of Avrillé - Press Fr. Christian Bouchacourt - July 1, 2015

1. For more than a year, the Dominican Fathers of the Convent of Avrillé propagate and guard vis-à-vis the authorities of the suspicion Society of St. Pius X , especially with regard to Bishop Fellay and the General House . At conferences, in publications and on their website they accuse superiors of the Society of Saint Pius X to give up the good fight of faith to lead it towards an agreement at any price with the Roman authorities. We have tried, unsuccessfully, at various meetings, to prove them wrong and show them how much their attitude endangered the unity of Tradition, sowing doubt and division. This press wants to restore the truth to defend the honor of our superiors and of our priestly family.

2. Highlights of this opposition increasingly open were as follows:

- Sunday, January 19, 2014, the Dominican Fathers distribute to people attending Mass at the Convent of Avrillé, the "loyal to address" a text published on 7 January and previous Menzingen accusing the General House to " the reverse path "of it done so far by Archbishop Lefebvre , " while approaching modernist Rome "and to persist" in this pathway that leads to death "; Fathers of Avrillé are among the signatories of this text;

- The same day, Pierre-Marie Father gives a lecture to the faithful came to Avrillé to explain and justify the validity of this "true to address";

- The text of this "true to address," accompanied by a supporting introduction, is published in The Salt of the Earth , No. 88 (Spring 2014), p. 138-139;

- The confidential correspondence with Bishop Fellay, following the publication of the "loyal to address," is published in The Salt of the Earth , No. 89 (Summer 2014), p. 215-220;

- Dominican fathers take position in favor of episcopal consecration of Bishop Faure March 19, 2015 and publish a long file justifying this act in The Salt of the Earth , No. 92 (Spring 2015), p. 139-169.

3. As all the signatories of the "loyal to address" the Dominican Fathers of Avrillé felt having to present " not a declaration of rupture with Saint Pius X, but rather the public witness of their strong commitment and faithful the principles that have always guided Archbishop Lefebvre in the fight of faith . " But they are so in a total illusion and will lead those who follow them. For this fight of faith, Archbishop Lefebvre had always conducted not only in the doctrinal fidelity to Tradition, but also in order, in unity and in peace, in the spirit of obedience. Avrillé fathers are not faithful to these principles, as they denigrate the authority of Archbishop Lefebvre's successor and throw suspicion on the actions of his government, to create a dialectic between the members of the Brotherhood and their superiors opponent even the priests among themselves. To detach an authority, it is necessary that the latter actually grows to sin against faith or morals. But the Dominicans of Avrillé are unable to show what the actions by the Superior General who express that " Menzingen is betraying the fight of faith . " This is not the General House that is betraying the fight of faith are those who call themselves "resistant" that weaken their subversive acts.

4. The consecration of a bishop by Bishop Williamson is in no way justified. Whatever bad pretexts by which we try to make it plausible, it only aggravates this spirit of independence and division. Archbishop Lefebvre has always been very clear for us to warn against such a state of mind. " It is the Superior General , "he said during a meeting held at Ecône, July 4, 1988," which maintains ties with Rome and, in a word, takes the responsibility of Tradition , because it is Brotherhood of the structure that exists in the eyes of the Church. We never wanted an organization of tradition or of a presidency of such an association, but it remains that de facto the Brotherhood is the backbone of Tradition, his providential instrument, which should support all initiatives Tradition ". In endorsing the episcopal consecration of Bishop Faure, the Dominican Fathers of Avrillé are complicit in a harmful work, and are causing serious harm to the common good of tradition, especially since the only reason given for this act is based on the accusation without proof that the Saint Pius X would have given up the fight of faith.

5. It is obvious that no superior, responsible before God for the good of his district, can not remain without reacting before those taken repeated position. We can not let settle into our ranks mistrust, division, party spirit and denigration. There is the common good of the flock and the first duty of a pastor is to preserve its unity and cohesion, putting the elusive these troublemakers.

6. Therefore, in the presence of so many false accusations, the District of France can no longer support the Dominicans of Avrillé community which, through its subversive activities, sows doubt and division in the ranks of Tradition and weakens his forces.

This situation is unfortunate. May the Holy Spirit enlighten the Superior of the Dominican community of Avrillé and that Our Lord and Our Lady keep us in the unity of truth and charity, true to the good fight of faith led by Archbishop Lefebvre for the honor of Christ the King, that of Holy Church and the good of our souls.

Abbot Christian BOUCHACOURT , District Superior of France of the SSPX ,
1 July 2015 on the feast of the Most Precious Blood of Our Lord

 
D

Deleted member 149

Guest
The foundation of the new-sspx position is based on lies; therefore, truth is an enemy.

Thus Menzingen and their vassals are busy at work trying to close down any opposition to their agenda while puffing up a narration to set a new story line. Though history repeats itself, power is transferred from the people to tyrants not because of good behavior but out of fear. Fear however begins on insecurities of some thing. In religion, it is a loss of faith that allows a vacuum of insecurity. In the state, it is a loss of moral (religion) and its restricted freedoms to act that breads insecurity.

When the powers that be sling hostilities at us (religious or the state), there is no room for discussion, diplomacy, or even an approach. It is a strong hand that is the visible agent of coercion.

Bishop Fellay wants to evoke God as a prime mover of his aggressive actions; other entities do this too. Assisi I, II, and III were evoke and inspired by the same. God is not in a box; we are.

Archbishop Lefebvre's life was moved with a humility that the Faith was not his own; nor something that he can change. Bishop Fellay has shown that the Faith can evolve through negotiation and political correctness. That the Faith can evolve in a new thinking to serve the Magesterium than the Magesterium is made to serve the Faith. [Here is an excellent article in order to understand this.]

The conviction of these neo-sspx superiors to disdain truth is the same as the Pharisaical pride trying to alter our Lord's Doctrine and belief in the Father; who alone can save them from their peril.

There is no excuse to abandon the historic cause of Archbishop Lefebvre in Tradition, all the evidence is there, unless one wills to leave. Which is the The aims of the Ecclesia Dei: to Destroy Catholic Tradition; to destroy Catholic Tradition.

Trust is earned; not based on fear.

 
S

seanjohnson

Guest
This memorandum is not supposed to be public.

It was only to be circulated internally to 3rd Order members.

May I ask who provided it to you?
 
D

Deleted member 149

Guest
<div class="quote" source="/post/6568/thread" timestamp="1435807300" author="@seanjohnson"><div class="quote_body"><div class="quote_avatar_container"><div class="avatar-wrapper avatar_size_quote avatar-0">//images.proboards.com/v5/defaultavatar.png</div></div><div class="quote_header">Jul 2, 2015 3:21:40 GMT @seanjohnson said:</div>This memorandum is not supposed to be public.

It was only to be circulated internally to 3rd Order members.

May I ask who provided it to you?<div class="quote_clear"></div></div></div>I do not understand your statement as being a "memorandum". When you follow the link provided, it is a direct link to the SSPX French District website; under Official texts.

Truth needs to be defended from fraudulent deception; regardless of its source. Falsehoods have no rights nor protection.

And if this be your understanding that the neo-sspx had an intention to "circulate this internally to 3rd Order members", thank you for confirming the continued operation that the neo-sspx chooses only to deceive its members.

Another manifestation of The French Revolution in a traditional cassock.

 
S

seanjohnson

Guest
Machabees said:
<div class="quote" source="/post/6568/thread" timestamp="1435807300" author="@seanjohnson"><div class="quote_body"><div class="quote_avatar_container"><div class="avatar-wrapper avatar_size_quote avatar-0">//images.proboards.com/v5/defaultavatar.png</div></div><div class="quote_header">Jul 2, 2015 3:21:40 GMT @seanjohnson said:</div>This memorandum is not supposed to be public.

It was only to be circulated internally to 3rd Order members.

May I ask who provided it to you?
I do not understand your statement as being a "memorandum". When you follow the link provided, it is a direct link to the SSPX French District website; under Official texts.

Truth needs to be defended from fraudulent deception; regardless of its source. Falsehoods have no rights nor protection.

And if this be your understanding that the neo-sspx had an intention to "circulate this internally to 3rd Order members", thank you for confirming the continued operation that the neo-sspx chooses only to deceive its members.

Another manifestation of The French Revolution in a traditional cassock.

<div class="quote_clear"></div></div></div>Machabees-

Admin posted a link titled "How the Dominicans Were Betrayed: Chronicle of Events"

If you click on that link, you are brought to an article called "Memorandum on the Steffeshausen Foundation"

This letter was an internal circular, to explain the situation to our own people (i.e., 3rd Order members), and was not intended for the internet.

 
S

seanjohnson

Guest
Admin said:
Hello Admin-

Yes, I wrote to EM about it at the time.

Neither he nor you could have known it was to have been an internal letter not for publication on the internet, so there is no fault in the moral sense.

But when I made the same argument to Avrille (i.e., Since the letter has already been published on the internet, would I be at liberty now to publish it on my [defunct] blog?"

The answer was, "No. Insofar as lies within us, we will not publish it on the internet."

My interest is not so much in seeing the Memorandum scrubbed from the internet, but in locating the person responsible for leaking internal documents to the internet (ie., They have proven themselves not trustworthy, and lacking in discretion).

There are reasons why discretion can be necessary, and the visit last year of the Dominicans to the USA in late October provides a good example:

On the very day the Dominicans set foot in America, the SSPX launched a video on their website promoting the bogus new Steffeshausen Foundation of "Dominicans."

More than this, Fr. Wegner sent a letter to all Avrille 3rd Order members, announcing this new foundation, and suggested we leave Avrille in favor of it.

Moral of the story: Had the Avrille visit been kept quiet, the Friars would have had an opportunity to have visited their Tertiaries and inform them of the latest events and situation between Menzingen and Avrille.

But because of the lack of discretion, the US District had the upper hand, drew first blood before Avrille could make the rounds, and likely surprised and confused many Avrille Tertiaries before they could hear the whole story.
 

Admin

Administrator
Admin said:
Hello Admin-

Yes, I wrote to EM about it at the time.

Neither he nor you could have known it was to have been an internal letter not for publication on the internet, so there is no fault in the moral sense.

But when I made the same argument to Avrille (i.e., Since the letter has already been published on the internet, would I be at liberty now to publish it on my [defunct] blog?"

The answer was, "No. Insofar as lies within us, we will not publish it on the internet."

My interest is not so much in seeing the Memorandum scrubbed from the internet, but in locating the person responsible for leaking internal documents to the internet (ie., They have proven themselves not trustworthy, and lacking in discretion).

There are reasons why discretion can be necessary, and the visit last year of the Dominicans to the USA in late October provides a good example:

On the very day the Dominicans set foot in America, the SSPX launched a video on their website promoting the bogus new Steffeshausen Foundation of "Dominicans."

More than this, Fr. Wegner sent a letter to all Avrille 3rd Order members, announcing this new foundation, and suggested we leave Avrille in favor of it.

Moral of the story: Had the Avrille visit been kept quiet, the Friars would have had an opportunity to have visited their Tertiaries and inform them of the latest events and situation between Menzingen and Avrille.

But because of the lack of discretion, the US District had the upper hand, drew first blood before Avrille could make the rounds, and likely surprised and confused many Avrille Tertiaries before they could hear the whole story.<div class="quote_clear"></div></div></div>

Thank you for the explanation.
 
D

Deleted member 149

Guest
The roll out of sspx.org had also posted Fr. Bouchacourt slanderous article against the Dominicans of Avrille. Why no discernment from those priests that the article lacks true information and substance? Unless it is a purposeful act of deception.

Here is their post so as to attached their other prior calamities against the Dominicans.

Workers of the darkness have a time limit before the sun shines to enlighten those who want to see.
 
Top