Doctors Question Coronavirus Paranoia in Viral Video (now deleted)



Tuesday, 28 April 2020

Doctors Question Coronavirus Paranoia in Viral Video; YouTube Deletes Video

Tyranny thrives on fear, and fear is usually based in large part on ignorance. We fear the things we don’t understand and the things we can’t see. When it comes to the current pandemic, we can’t see the pathogen, and, generally, most people don’t understand it. Moreover, most people don’t understand how a normal human immune system works and responds to a bacterial or viral invader. Because of this fear and lack of knowledge, opportunistic politicians have seized on the chance to impose ever-more-ridiculous restrictions on human activity. And because people are afraid of what they don’t understand, a compliant populace has rolled over to the imposition of authoritarian rule. Safety at all cost, from the phantom pathogen, is being used to wage war on the rights of the people. Fear, to paraphrase Randolph Bourne, is the health of the state.

Facts and understanding are the vaccines that are needed to fight off the virus of totalitarianism that is now infecting the world. And a devastating recitation of facts is just what has been provided by two doctors from California in a pair of videos, one of which has been censored by YouTube after having received 5.46 million views, but not before being posted on other channels (video below).

Drs. Daniel W. Erickson and Artin Massihi are co-owners of Accelerated Urgent Care in Bakersfield, California. Combined, they have more than 40 years of hands-on experience in providing medical care and in treating viral infections and respiratory illnesses. Today, they are a primary provider of tests for COVID-19 in their county, having performed several thousand such tests. In a lengthy “briefing” interview with the local ABC television affiliate channel 23 in Bakersfield, they provide the facts and data that demonstrate that the lockdowns are not needed and may, in fact, be counterproductive.

According to Dr. Erickson, first of all, the models that predicted doomsday scenarios and were used as justification by political figures for the lockdowns have proven wildly inaccurate. Actual data proves that the infection is very widespread, making death rates considerably lower than predicted by the models preferred by public health politicians and bureaucrats.

“What is materializing in the state of California is 12 percent positives,” notes Dr. Erickson. We have 39.5 million people. If we just take a basic calculation and extrapolate that out, that equates to about 4.7 million cases throughout the state of California, which means this thing is widespread. That’s the good news. We’ve seen 1,227 deaths in the state of California with a possible incidence or prevalence of 4.7 million; that means you have a 0.03 chance of dying from COVID-19 in the state of California.”

That’s a low number, Dr. Erickson notes. And it’s the same thing elsewhere. “The more you test, the more positives you get, the prevalence number goes up, and the death rate stays the same, so it gets smaller and smaller and smaller,” he remarks. “And as we move through this data what I want you to see is millions of cases, small amount of death. Millions of cases, small amount of death, and you will see that in every state.”

Critics argue that this outcome is due solely to the role of mitigation, of social distancing, of masks, and of the lockdowns in general. But, Erickson notes, we have data that calls that conclusion into question.

That data comes from a comparison of outcomes in Sweden, which did not lockdown the country, and next-door Norway, which did institute lockdown measures. Comparing these two Scandinavian nations, Dr. Erickson noted:

When you bring up a system of lockdown you automatically have to compare it to system of no lockdown. Sweden and Norway. Norway has lockdown, Sweden does not have lockdown. What happened in those two countries? Are they vastly different? Did Sweden have a massive outbreak of cases? Did Norway have nothing? Let’s look at the numbers. Sweden: Sweden has 15,322 cases of COVID. They did 74,600 tests, which is 21 percent, similar to the other countries, 21 percent of all those tested came up positive for COVID. What’s the population of Sweden? About 10.4 million. So if we extrapolate out the data, about 2 million cases of COVID in Sweden. They did a little bit of social distancing, they would wear masks and separate, they went to schools, stores were open, they were almost about their normal daily life with a little bit of social distancing. They had how many deaths? 1,765. California has had 1,220 with isolation. No isolation: 1,765. We have more people — what I’m getting at is millions of cases, very small death. Millions of cases, very small death. This is what we’re seeing everywhere. Norway, its next door neighbor, this is where I come from. These are two Scandinavian nations, we can compare them as they are similar. Let’s look at the data. Norway: 7,191 cases of COVID. Total COVID tests: 145,279. So they came up with 4.9 percent of all COVID tests were positive in Norway. Population of Norway: 5.4 million. So if we extrapolate the data as we have been doing, which is the best we can do at this point, they have about 1.3 million cases. Now, their deaths as a total number were 182, fairly small, but statistically insignificant from 1,700, you realize. Millions of cases, small amount of death. 1,700 [or] 100, these are statistically insignificant. So you have a .003 chance of death as a citizen of Norway, and a 97 percent recovery. Their numbers are a little bit better. Does it necessitate shut down, loss of jobs, destruction of the oil company, furloughing doctors? That’s the question I have for you.​

In this analysis, Drs. Erickson and Massihi are not alone. Other health professionals and researchers, too, are questioning the necessity of the lockdowns or the wisdom of the authoritarian response. These include Dr. Knut Wittkowski, former head of Rockefeller University’s Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design; Dr. David L. Katz, former president of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine; and Professor Johan Giesecke, an epidemiologist who was first chief scientist of the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, among several others.

Intriguingly, Erickson and Massihi go further, arguing, as did Dr. Wittkowski, that the lockdowns will be counterproductive. Why this might be so is related to how the immune system functions.

Like much of biology, human physiology is wonderfully complex, and the immune system, considered on its own, is a marvel of biochemical engineering. Elaine N. Marieb, in her text Human Anatomy and Physiology, describes the immune system as a marvel “which stalks and eliminates with nearly equal precision almost any type of pathogen that intrudes the body.” While the immune system has mechanisms for general defense, ultimately it works to best effect only when it has learned what it must fight. The immune system “must ‘meet’ or be primed by an initial exposure to a foreign substance (antigen) before it can protect the body against that substance,” Marieb writes.

One way it does this, where viruses are concerned, is through the production and release of proteins that help cells defend themselves against viral invasion. Regarding this aspect of immunity, Marieb writes:

Viruses — essentially, nucleic acids surrounded by a protein coat — lack the cellular machinery to generate ATP [adenosine triphosphate, a molecule with a key role in powering cell activity] or synthesize proteins. They do their “dirty work” or damage in the body by invading tissue cells and taking over the cellular metabolic machinery needed to reproduce themselves. Although the virus-infected cells can do little to save themselves, they can help defend cells that have not yet been infected by secreting small proteins called interferons. The interferon molecules diffuse to nearby cells, where they stimulate synthesis of other proteins, which then inhibit, or “interfere” with, viral replication in those cells. Interferon’s protection is not virus-specific (i.e., interferon produced against a particular virus protects against a variety of other viruses.)​

Thus, exposure to viruses in the environment tends to make the human immune system more effective against other viruses. This lesser-known response to viruses helps the body’s immune system as it prepares a defense against specific pathogens. This latter response provides adaptive protection against specific invaders and, as the body has learned what those invaders are, provides longer-term immunity against them. Collectively, when this happens among many people in the wider population it creates what is known as “herd immunity,” a key element in bringing an end to an epidemic.

For their part, Drs. Erickson and Massihi point out that the lockdowns, by keeping people inside and away from more biologically complex environments, may reduce the immune system’s effectiveness because of reduced exposure to pathogens that may stimulate immune activity.

“The immune system is built by exposure to antigens: viruses, bacteria,” Dr. Erickson noted. “When you are a little child crawling on the ground putting stuff in your mouth, viruses and bacteria come in, you form an antigen antibody complex.… This is how your immune system is built. You don’t take a small child, put them in bubble wrap in a room and say, ‘go have a healthy immune system.’ This is immunology, microbiology 101. This is the basis of what we’ve known for years. When you take human beings and you say, go into your house, clean all your counters, Lysol them down. You’re going to kill 99 percent of viruses and bacteria. Wear a mask. Don’t go outside. What does that do to our immune system? Our immune system is used to touching. We share bacteria, staphylococcal, streptococcal bacterium, viruses, we develop an immune response daily to this stuff. When you take that away from me my immune system drops. As I shelter in place, my immune system drops. You keep me there for months, it drops more. And now I’m at home hand washing vigorously, washing the counters, worried about things that are indeed what I need to survive. Let’s follow the science. This is immunology, folks. This is microbiology. This is what we’ve combined together, we have 40 years of experience in this. This is common sense immunology.”

The opinions of these doctors, of course, is a direct challenge to the prevailing coronavirus orthodoxy. So it is no surprise that the statist guardians of that orthodoxy have reacted, criticizing the doctors from one direction, while silencing them from another.

The criticism has come from two physicians groups, the American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP). In a statement, the two groups said they “jointly and emphatically condemn” the opinions of Drs. Erickson and Messihi. “These reckless and untested musings do not speak for medical society and are inconsistent with current science and epidemiology regarding COVID-19,” the organizations said.

As the two medical groups were announcing their criticisms of the doctors, YouTube decided to censor them altogether, in a move that will surprise no one. According to ABC 23, the news channel that interviewed the doctors, “YouTube pulled a 23ABC video recording of Drs. Erickson and Messihi speaking. The video was one of two parts of the press conference uploaded to YouTube.”

The station also noted that they had asked YouTube to reconsider their censorship of the doctors.

“23ABC has appealed to YouTube to have the video re-uploaded,” the station said. The video has been posted on other YouTube channels, however, and can still be viewed — for now.


Last edited:


A 'pandemic drone' and other technology could help limit the spread of
coronavirus and ease restrictions sooner, but at what cost?


A pandemic drone can be used to track temperatures, fever and social distancing.

Key points:
  • New technology is making mass tracking of people and their health easier
  • A pandemic drone can pick up heart rate, body temperature and monitor social distancing
  • But the technology is also increasing concerns about privacy and data collection
If you don't feel comfortable signing up to the Government's COVIDSafe tracking app, then you probably won't be happy to hear about the pandemic drone.

Software being developed at the University of South Australia in conjunction with Canadian drone manufacturer Draganfly could see drones used to monitor the health of people, including spotting sneezes and tracking whether they have a fever.
It is just one way technology could be used to track and slow the spread of a virus like COVID-19.
But experts warn that new surveillance technologies must include privacy safeguards before they are adopted.

Heart rate can be detected within 8 metres

Javaan Chahl with his drone and some test patients

Javaan Chahl hopes his pandemic drone will be used to collect mass data and track patterns of behaviour.(ABC News: Lincoln Rothall)

Professor Javaan Chahl, who holds positions with the University of South Australia and the Department of Defence, is developing software for the pandemic drone.

The device uses thermal cameras and artificial intelligence to measure some of the indicators of coronavirus in groups of people: heart rate, body temperature, coughing and sneezing.

"Heart rate can be measured in two different ways," he told 7.30.

"From a drone, we normally would measure it by a subtle change in skin tone that's associated with each heartbeat. "And it's caused by changing the volume of blood in the skin. It also causes slight movement."

The drone would also be able to detect a cough from "15-20 metres away", while heart rate can be detected within 6-8 metres with only a "very small" margin of error.

It could also be used to monitor social distancing.

While still six months from completion, Professor Chahl hoped it would be used to collect data on a large scale and track patterns of behaviour to paint a broad picture of the spread of COVID-19 in a city, rather than monitor individuals.

"When you look at thousands of people, or millions of people, you'll start to see a trend," he said.

"And I think we don't have systems in place to surveil for that, particularly. "It would be very useful to know how many people are suffering from symptoms associated with respiratory distress.

"So, if you see a lot of people coughing and sneezing and with elevated heart rates
and breathing rates and fever, okay, that's good to know.

"And if that's increasing, that's very important to know."

Concerns about 'big brother surveillance'

Baxter the robot wraps his arms around Toby Walsh, who is sitting on a chair in front of it

Toby Walsh, an expert in artificial intelligence, has concerns about how new technology could be used.(Supplied: UNSW Grant Turner)
Professor Chahl does acknowledge the technology could also be used to watch and target individuals if a future user wanted to.

"All such technologies carry a risk with them," he said.
"I might think it's a very bad idea to use drones to chase people around who might be sick. But perhaps others might have different ideas.
"And it's very hard to restrain them from using it like that once the genie is out of the bottle."

Police in the US city of Westport, an hour north of New York, were trialling the software along with Draganfly, but pulled out last week over privacy concerns.
"There's a lot of discussion going on at the moment about how we manage that privacy so that you don't take away people's freedom, or start imposing on them unnecessarily," Professor Chahl said.

"But you do want to watch for the presence of this infectious disease. So there's a lot of challenges."

Artificial intelligence expert Professor Toby Walsh urged a cautious approach towards adopting technologies like the pandemic drone.

"I think the devil is in the detail: how it's rolled out, what safeguards are put in place," he said.

"There's every reason that this technology could be a useful tool in our armoury with rolling back the restrictions and allowing people to go about somewhat more normal lives.

"But, equally, there are concerns that you'd have about people's privacy and about whether when normality has returned, that we are not finding ourselves in a big brother surveillance state."

Surveillance tech already used overseas
A fore arm with a Hong Kong coronavirus tracking wristband with blurry kitchen items in the background

Hong Kong makes arrivals to the territory wear a tracking wristband and self-isolate for 14 days.(ABC News)

Several places in east Asia, including Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea, have taken a more technology-driven approach to fighting coronavirus, successfully slowing the rate of transmission without enforcing the same strict lockdowns seen in Australia and some European countries, and keeping shops and restaurants open.

Everyone who lands in Hong Kong must download a mandatory phone app and wear a wristband for two weeks while in compulsory quarantine.
The app and wristband work together to track the user's whereabouts, along with regular video calls from health officials.
Professor Walsh doubts that level of surveillance would go down well in Australia.

"These are extraordinary times, but I think those are extraordinary measures that I suspect most people in Australia would find too much down the road to taking us to what [authors] George Orwell, Huxley and other people have warned us about the surveillance state that we could be in," Professor Walsh said.

Another distinct feature of Hong Kong's tech-driven approach to tackling the virus is the routine use of temperature checks, which are a common sight at the entrance to restaurants, offices, shopping malls and government buildings across the city.

Fever scanning
Rustom Kanga in a light blue shirt and black jacket, with a camera and computer on the table behind him

Rustom Kanga has developed an automated fever scanning system.(ABC News: Jerry Rickard)

Australian entrepreneur Rustom Kanga hopes that temperature-taking technology will soon be more widespread here.

His company iOmniscient has developed an automated fever scanning system which can operate through CCTV cameras to check the temperatures of people in crowds.

He claimed it was accurate "to about 0.2 of a degree Celsius".

"Now and in the future, we will be releasing the lockdown, there'll be lesser restrictions," he told 7.30.

"And in those environments we are going to still have to keep track of everyone.

"We are going to have to monitor people to make sure that there is no one round with a fever, because the fever is the first external indication, usually, of an infection of the coronavirus."

Dr Kanga said the software used artificial intelligence, including facial recognition, to automatically read the body temperature of "hundreds of people" at once in a crowd and alert authorities if someone had a fever.

The system could then track them through a network of cameras until they could be identified by a staff member or official.

"It uses what is called a thermographic camera, which is a camera that can detect the heat of things in the environment," he said.

"In this case, it's detecting the temperature of a person's skin."

Dr Kanga believed the technology could be useful in places where people are still gathering in groups such as schools, pharmacies, shops, defence facilities, hospitals and prisons.

"Today there is no real checking in public areas of whether people have fevers," he said.

"A system like this will give them an early indication that there's someone who potentially has a fever."

We won't be able to 'go back to our normal lives'
Black and white thermal imaging of people showing their temperatures

Proponents say technology like automated fever scanning could help ease coronavirus restrictions sooner.(ABC News)

The use of facial recognition technology is highly controversial and concerns have long been raised by civil liberties groups about its use in public spaces and about the potential for authorities to use it to track citizens.

But Dr Kanga said his software "anonymised" faces by default and people would only be identified when requested by the user.
"Everyone's face can be redacted so that nobody sees anything," he said.

"However, if there's a person with a fever, that person's image is sent to the smartphone or the paramedic so that he can be checked out."
Professor Walsh said technologies like this could be part of Australia's approach, but won't replace the need for social distancing.
"It's worth pointing out those modern technologies are not going to be a panacea," he said.

"They're not going to allow us to go back to our normal lives, we are still going to have to social distance, we are still going to have to keep ourselves isolated physically as much as possible from each other until we have a vaccine.

"And, until that point, our lives are going to be somewhat on hold."



9 Simulations, Drills and Laws that Planned and Prepared for the Coronavirus

Published 6 days ago on April 28, 2020
By Makia Freeman
Last Updated on April 29, 2020

prepared for the coronavirus
Learn about at least 9 simulations, drills & laws that planned & prepared for the coronavirus,
plus other coronavirus foreknowledge. Coincidence? No!

They planned and prepared for the coronavirus …
decades in advance. The infrastructure has been clearly set up over the last 2+ decades to ensure that when Operation Coronavirus went live, all the pieces would be in place to bamboozle and enslave people, forcing them into a place where they would gladly accept or beg for mass vaccination. Operation Coronavirus resembles a false flag op in many ways. One similarity is that it was meticulously planned for long in advance. Astute readers may notice another similarity: the phenomenon of the drill “going live” (we are in a “live exercise” as Mike Pompeo said). This crops up in so many false flag attacks, i.e. when the exact scenario being trained and prepared for in an exercise occurs in the real world. Below is a list of various simulations, drills, exercises, papers, scenarios and laws that all in some way anticipated and prepared for the coronavirus pandemic.

Dark Winter (June 2001)
The NWO (New World Order) ruling class and the USG (US Government) have been carrying out drills or simulations for pandemics for a long time. In June 2001, they conducted an operation known as Dark Winter which simulated a biowarfare anthrax attack. By a strange coincidence, such an anthrax attack actually happened after 9/11. By another strange coincidence, Johns Hopkins was involved, and they also just happened to be involved in Event 201 (see below). On this website, the Johns Hopkins’ Center for Health Security summarizes Dark Winter as an exercise which “portrayed a fictional scenario depicting a covert smallpox attack on US citizens. The scenario is set in 3 successive NSC meetings that take place over 2 weeks. The exercise was held at Andrews Air Force Base, Washington, DC.” Johns Hopkins is responsible for the ‘official’ (and inflated) COVID-19 case and death count map.

Whitney Webb’s piece on Dark Winter points out how “government insiders had foreknowledge of the Covid-19 crisis on a scale that, thus far, has gone unreported and that those same insiders are now manipulating the government’s response and public panic in order to reap record profits and gain unprecedented power for themselves.” She writes:
“Upon further investigation, key leaders of both Event 201 and Crimson Contagion, not only have deep and longstanding ties to U.S. Intelligence and the U.S. Department of Defense, they were all previously involved in that same June 2001 exercise, Dark Winter. Some of these same individuals would also play a role in the FBI’s “sabotaged” investigation into the subsequent Anthrax attacks and are now handling major aspects of the U.S. government’s response to the Covid-19 crisis. One of those individuals, Robert Kadlec, was recently put in charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) entire Covid-19 response efforts, despite the fact that he was recently and directly responsible for actions that needlessly infected Americans with Covid-19.
Other major players in Dark Winter are now key drivers behind the “biodefense” mass surveillance programs currently being promoted as a technological solution to Covid-19’s spread, despite evidence that such programs actually worsen pandemic outbreaks. Others still have close connections to the insider trading that recently occurred among a select group of U.S. Senators regarding the economic impact of Covid-19 and are set to personally profit from lucrative contracts to develop not just one, but the majority, of experimental Covid-19 treatments and vaccines currently under development by U.S. companies.”
Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (Drafted 2001)
MSEHPA (Model State Emergency Health Powers Act) is a public health act originally drafted by the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) with the intention of getting the 50 US states to enact similar legislation. It included sweeping and draconian legislation – including forced vaccination – as a response to epidemics, pandemics and bioterrorism. It is crucial to realize that the CDC owns patents on several vaccines so functions as a giant vaccine company as a much as (or even more so than) a governmental agency. The ACLU writes:

“The Act lets a governor declare a state of emergency unilaterally and without judicial oversight, fails to provide modern due process procedures for quarantine and other emergency powers, it lacks adequate compensation for seizure of assets, and contains no checks on the power to order forced treatment and vaccination … The act includes an overbroad definition of “public health emergency” that sweeps in HIV, AIDS, and other diseases that clearly do not justify quarantine, forced treatment, or any of the other broad emergency authorities that would be granted under the Act … The Act requires the disclosure of massive amounts of personally identifiable health information to public health authorities, without requiring basic privacy protections …”
According to Wikipedia:
“The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons claimed that the draft used sweeping language to the extent that it “could turn governors into dictators” since the MSEHPA gave governors the authority to declare public health emergencies, and afterward force vaccinations on the general public without their informed consent. The deployment of state National Guards could be used to administer the vaccines or substances. Legal liabilities for drug companies which manufactured the vaccines and/or substances were removed.”
“As of 2007, 33 states had introduced 133 legislative bills or resolutions that were based upon or featured provisions related to the articles or sections of the act. Of these, 48 had passed … As of August 1, 2011, forty states have passed various forms of MSEHPA legislation.”
The Project BioShield Act (2004)
The Project Bioshield Act was an act passed by the United States Congress in 2004 calling for $5.6 billion for purchasing vaccines that would be used in the event of a bioterrorist attack. It was passed in the years following 9/11 and the Dark Winter-predicted anthrax attack, in days of fear over WMDs, chemical weapons, biological weapons and more. This law is classic problem-reaction-solution stuff, justifying all sorts of Big Pharma interventions by playing off the fear of the day. It was basically a 10-year, almost $6 billion plan for the USG to create and produce vaccines and treatments for anthrax, ebola, the plague and other potential bioterrorism agents. This FAS article reports:

“This law has three main provisions: (1) relaxing procedures for some CBRN [chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear] terrorism-related spending, including hiring and awarding research grants; (2) guaranteeing a federal government market for new CBRN medical countermeasures; and (3) permitting emergency use of unapproved countermeasures. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has used each of these authorities. The HHS used expedited review authorities to approve grants relating to developing treatments for radiation exposure and used the authority to guarantee a government market to obligate approximately $2.3 billion to acquire countermeasures against anthrax, botulism, radiation, and smallpox. The HHS has also employed the emergency use authority several times including allowing young children with H1N1 “swine flu” to receive specific antiviral drugs.”
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (2005)
Where would Big Pharma be without their favorite politicians constantly passing laws to legally protect them from liability arising from their toxic products? In 1986, the US Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which set up special courts for the vaccine-damaged. The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, codified at 42 USC §247d-6d, gives the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) the power to waive legal liability for corporations producing “covered countermeasures” (i.e. vaccines) in the case of a public health emergency. A PREP Act Declaration (effective February 4th 2020) was issued to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19.
rockefeller foundation paper

A 2010 Rockefeller Foundation paper analyzed the NWO plan to use a pandemic to grab power.

Lock Step (Rockefeller Foundation Paper, 2010)
As I covered in an earlier article 2010 Rockefeller Foundation Paper and The New Normal, a Rockefeller Foundation paper analyzed a scenario called “Lock Step” (a phrase with negative overtones and suggestive of soldiers, military and fascism) where they outlined governmental responses to a rapidly emerging viral pandemic. The paper outlined a scenario where a pandemic has hit, and the governments of the world use it to expand their authority and increase their grip on power. Although the authors of the paper try to claim they are just imagining not predicting the future, given the immense role of the Rockefeller family bloodline and Rockefeller Foundation in pushing the NWO Global Government, this is a ruse to cover their active planning for crisis scenarios that they know will happen. It is also a fine example of predictive programming.
USNORTHCOM Branch Plan 3560 (January 2017)
This unclassified 2017 US Military paper from NORTHCOM warned of a possible “novel influenza disease” that could strike the US and leave it unprepared. It outlines a planned and coordinated response to an infectious disease outbreak involving numerous governmental agencies, such as DHS, FEMA, USDA, HHS and even NGOs like USAID.

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Act (2017)
Similar to section 817 of the Patriot Act (the Expansion of the Biological Weapons Statute which gave the USG immunity from violating its own biological weapons laws), this act reorganizes the Department of Homeland Security’s National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD) into a new agency: the Critical Infrastructure and Cyber Security Agency. ActivistPost reporter Janet Phelan wrote that this new act further cemented the USG’s “ability to covertly deploy through water, which is defined as critical infrastructure, any biological or chemical agent and claim not only immunity but also deny any legal right to protest this through the legal system. Given the covert nature of this delivery system, it is to be expected that the US would claim that the resultant mass deaths to be attributable to a naturally occurring pandemic.”

Crimson Contagion (August 2019)
In 2019, there were 2 exercises conducted in the second half of the year that both happened to simulate a situation where a viral pandemic broke out and made its way to the US! The first one, that finished in August 2019, was called Crimson Contagion and was run by the USG. The full name was Crimson Contagion 2019 Functional Exercise. In it, the USG prophetically simulated a viral outbreak that began in China and landed in Chicago, infecting 110 million Americans. The conclusion of the ‘simulation’ was that the Federal Government lacked the funds, coordination and resources to effectively combat the virus, a finding which justifies even greater spending on pandemic preparedness. The simulation was led by former Air Force physician Robert Kadlec (mentioned above) who was also involved in Dark Winter … and now COVID-19. What another amazing coincidence.

Event 201 (October 2019)
It’s the event everyone is talking about! On October 18th, 2019 in New York, the Johns Hopkins Center in partnership with World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201 – A Global Pandemic Exercise which was a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic that broke out in Brazil and came to the USA. Just another coincidence of course. Attendees included the US CDC, the Chinese CDC, WEF (in partnership with the WHO), Big Pharma reps (e.g. Johnson and Johnson) and others. Event 201 was run by NWO frontman Bill Gates, who has used his fortune to push GMOs and vaccines all over the world. Gates has been very visible during this pandemic using MSM platforms to preach the need for mandatory vaccines and possible “digital certificates” or “immunity passports”which people would need to travel again after the lockdown.

Other Foreknowledge Showing Some Were Prepared for the Coronavirus – Imminently
Other foreknowledge outside of the above 9 points includes the US senators who dumped stocks right before the outbreak began (between late January and February 14th), as well as the hundreds of CEOs who unexpectedly quit around January 2020. Are we meant to believe that was all this just lucky timing? Why did USG, on September 30th 2019, end the pandemic early-warning program to detect coronaviruses, just months before the coronavirus crisis started in China? Just as there was clear 9/11 foreknowledge, so too is there clear and unmistakable coronavirus foreknowledge.

Clearly, They Prepared for the Coronavirus
So all in all, Operation Coronavirus is a carefully engineered crisis which has been planned at least 2 decades in advance, if not longer. The psychopathic social engineers who run the world have AI supercomputers to test all scenarios and permutations of their ideas, just like plugging in variables into an algebraic equation. One thing is for sure: this operation has many phases and possibilities and we are just in the opening scene of what is to come. The plan is to rapidly accelerate as many NWO agendas as possible while people are still ignorant and afraid. To what extent they succeed will depend on how many people can get out of fear, educate themselves, unite and stand in the true sovereign power, in the knowledge of their inherent birthright of freedom.
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at Makia is on Steemit and FB.