When Bishop Williamson called a novus ordo Cardinal "brave" and "honorable" fighting for the rights of Vatican II isn't enough for concern, Bishop Williamson just stated in his recent Eleison comments (Putin Speaks) that the Orthodox religion of Vladimir Putin is a follower of Christ. Of course there is only one Christ and that Christ founded the Catholic religion for men to find redemption and the path to salvation. The Catholic Church is the ONLY doctrinal and moral compass that is pleasing to God based on His revelation through His Son Jesus Christ. For Bishop Williamson however, he is channeling that the moral premise without the doctrinal obligation is a road worthy to follow in example of orthodox commentary and calls them "christian"; like the neo-sspx bountifully extols other religions with the SAME name and badge of Catholics. "Some experts in the perfidy of the New World Order are still distrustful of Vladimir Putin, which is understandable, but as Americans say, if he talks, walks and quacks like a follower of Christ, then common sense says that he is a follower of Christ. Read here a version (taken from video sub-titles) of a speech of his one year ago in Russia, and judge for yourselves if his world-vision is not Christian:- ...Without the moral values that are rooted in Christianity and other world religions, without rules and moral values that have been formed and developed over thousands of years, people inevitably lose their human dignity. As for ourselves we think it is right and natural to defend these moral values coming from Christianity. We must respect the right to self-determination of every minority, but by the same token there cannot and must not be any doubt about the rights of the majority." (Eleison Comments, Putin Speaks, #535) For BW dredging the views of non-catholics highlighting their quotes than what the Church and Her saints have said for consumption, only leads to the same denominator, non-catholic impulses for man-made ideas. Is there no more commentary of Catholic scholars and marvels of saints God had raised? Why so many Eleison comments given paragraph after paragraph to laymen's democratic views? Can't the bishop speak for himself? Opening the door to ecumenism has been BW new venture. He also said in July 2016 the Anglican church has true worship in it, quote: "Our Lord said seek and you shall find; knock and it will be open to you. If you look for the truth, and you look for the true worship of God, you may find some of it in an Anglican Church. But you start talking to the minister, probably his principles are most likely are not completely true.” (Bishop Richard Williamson: 'The Existence of God: The Pre-requisite for all Politics', July 2016, @1:19:09, www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQalQor5itQ Now the Orthodox are the SAME believers as Catholics he feeds to his followers. Channeling conciliarism is a punishment quite clear when the Lord God is not served as the only God man must bow to. So is this all BW's views? No, his three other bishops (Faure, Aquinas, Zendejas) are complicit following this new faith of BW without saying a word of condemnation, displeasure, or any ode of conflict. These bishops have been silent on all of BW's modernistic views shown here Quotes of Bp. Williamson supporting the new religion and conciliarism. To be fair to these bishops, I was given first hand knowledge of a person who sent those quotes to ALL of the bishops and to many of his false resistance priests almost one year ago when it was posted. Moreover, they ALL read these Eleison Comments too; not a word or any consternation. Result...SILENT CONSENT! "Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it; and indeed to neglect to confound evil men, when we can do it, is no less a sin than to encourage them." - Pope St. Felix III .